Quarterly Status Report on Fuel Cell Advancement Initiative
Agenda Item No,15
County of Santa Clara
Facilities And Fleet Department
4.
A,
^-t\i
■'^rcV^'
FAF03 020206
Prepared by: Caroline Judy
Manager, Intragoveminental
Support Services
DATE:
February 2, 2006
TO:
Supervisor Pete McHugh, Chairperson
Supervisor Liz Kniss, Vice-Chairperson
Finance & Government Operations Committee
FROM:
Larry Jinkins
Director of Facilities and Fleet Department
SUBJECT:
Quarterly Fuel Cell Initiative Status Report
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Accept status report on advancement of the Fuel Cell Initiative adopted by the Board on September 14, 2004.
ETSCAT. TMPLTCATIONS
Acceptance of this report will not impact the General Fund.
Board of Supervisors: Ddriaid F. Gaga, Blanca Aivarado, Pete McHugh, Jim Beaii, Liz Kniss
Gounly Executivei'Peter Kutras Jf,.
/
'Gommitte©jAflentla Date:Februaiy 2,2006:
Agenda Item No. IS
CONTRACT HISTORY
Not applicable.
REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
In September 2004, the Board of Supervisors approved the Santa Clara County Fuel Cell Advancement Initiative. This
Initiative has five recommendations with direction to the County Executive to:
1. Consider stationary fuel cell applications when planning for building projects and
energy-system upgrades.
2. Identify a fuel cell vehicle demonstration project and work with the California Fuel Cell Partnership to lease a vehiele
to the County.
3. Contract with a consultant to assist the County with planning for fuel cell implementation, and obtain grant funding
for these eonsultant serviees.
4. Consider sponsoring legislation related to fuel cell technology expansion and advaneement of other clean distributed
energy generation application.
5. Participate in local and regional information—exchange forums with stakeholders.
This report is provided as an update on the progress of the Fuel Cell Advancement Initiative in five different areas;
Plarming, Financing, Legislation, Vehicles, and Buildings. The last status report to the Finance and Government
Operations Committee was on August 19, 2005.
Planning Process for Site/Technolosv Selection and Outreach Program
The Fuel Cell Initiative proposes to engage the services of a consultant to assist in the development of a planning
process to: a) assist in the selection of stationary fuel eell project sites, b) evaluate appropriate fuel cell technologies for
specific sites, and c) develop an education and outreach plan to build public awareness of clean fuel technologies.
The planning process will allow the County and community based partners to maximize available resources by
conducting joint projects and educational programs. The focus will be on developing feasible stationary fuel cell projects
imder the Califomia Public Interest Energy Research - Environmentally Preferable Advanced Generation Program
(EPAG). The County and its partners will also utilize the Califomia Public Utilities Commission Self-Generation
Buy—down program. The planning process is intended to create an innovative model that will be compatible with the
directives of the Califomia Hydrogen Highways program and that can be replicated by other local and regional ageneies.
The first requirement for initiating this planning process is that of obtaining funding for consultant services. As
described below, the County has been attempting to obtain funding through the State Department of Transportation
(CALTRANS)Community Planning grant program.
'Board bfBUpeivlspfs:!bohald F.'bagC
County Executive Peter kutras-j
Pete tlcHugh,Jim'Beall, Oz-Khiss
CommtttiBeAienda Date:Februaiy 2,2006i:
Agehda Mem No. 15
Financing
The Fuel Cell Initiative proposed to use funds from a CALTRANS Community Plarming grant to engage the services of
a consultant to assist in the plarming process described above. Following Board approval, the County submitted a grant
applieation with CALTRANS in October 2004 for the Community Planning grant. In June 2005 the County learned it
was not one of the grant recipients. The County rewrote the previous grant submission, and resubmitted it for a FY 2007
CALTRANS Community planning grant in October 2005.
Without further Board direction, the Administration does not have the authority to utilize General Fund resources in this
planning effort. Thus, the fuel cell planning process envisioned in the Fuel Cell Initiative is on hold pending approval of
the CALTRANS grant funds.
The Board of Supervisors approved a Fuel Cell Initiative Federal Earmark request on February 8, 2005. Senators
Feinstein, Boxer and Congressman Honda supported the request of Fossil Energy Research and Development funds to
fund fuel cell power generation demonstration projects at Vasona Cormty Park and at another County facility.
Congressman Mike Honda was very helpful in obtaining final approval for the Earmark in the Department of Energy
budget.
These efforts were successful and resulted in the County obtaining $1.48 million from a FY 2006 Federal Earmark to
fund the Fuel Cell Initiative. These funds can be used for purchase and constmction of a stationary Fuel Cell power
generation system. Administration intends to send a representative to Washington D.C. in early Febmary to attend an
informational seminar for Department of Energy Earmark awardees.
There is a 50% local match requirement for the DOE earmark. Administration has tentatively identified a non-General
Fund, the Williams Settlement fund, as a possible matching fund source.
Since January 2003, Santa Clara Coimty has received $2 million for altemative power production and energy
conservation projects as a result of partieipation in class action litigation against three wholesale electricity suppliers;
Reliant Energy, Williams Energy Marketing & Trading, and Duke Power. The original lawsuit was filed in November
2000 and the County joined as a plaintiff in March 2002. The County's lawsuit and others were combined into a master
complaint known as the Wholesale Electricity Antitmst Cases I and II. In November 2002, the plaintiffs in the lawsuits
settled with the Williams defendants — hence the name; Williams Settlement. The County of Santa Clara was one of
several litigants receiving settlement payments for overcharges, damages and restitution. The Williams Settlement funds
must be used for altemative energy production or energy conservation purposes.
The County has used $1.9 million of these funds for energy conservation projects in County-wide facilities. Funds have
been expended on Building Operations energy conservation projects, and other projects identified through the Chevron
Energy Audit program. A final payment of $1.5 million will be reeeived in January 2007. Administration may
recommend to the Board that the remaining $1.5 million payment be allocated to implement the Board approved Fuel
Cell Initiative. It is anticipated that $742,500 of these funds could be applied as the 50% match requirement for the $1.4
million Federal Earmark. The next quarterly Fuel Cell report will provide additional information obtained from the DOE
Earmark Awardee briefing, and may include a specific recommendation regarding the use of the Williams Settlement
funds as a potential match for these federal fiinds.
Legislative
^Boafd ofSupeMsprsi'Diqnaia-RDage,
:|:ounty,E)«cutive|Pethfkufr|
P4B^;McjHugh',.Jjrnpieall, Li?Knlss
Committeefigenda Date:Fettruaiy 2,2006;
Agenda Item No. 15
Legislative initiatives were also successful in the past quarter. With Legislative Conunittee and Board of Supervisors
approval, the County sent support letters on AB 1660. This bill requires the State Department of General Services to
partner with counties, cities and school districts to create a statewide government group purchase program that would
negotiate the lowest possible purchase price for alternative fuel and hybrid vehicles. This measure also requires the
Department of General Services to establish, no later than April 1, 2006, an advisory committee consisting of
representatives from partner organizations to promote the use of hybrids in fleet programs. The legislation was
successful.
Buildings
During 2005, the County held a series of information-exchange meetings with vendors ofFuel Cell systems. The intent
of these meetings was to familiarize the County with; a)the types offuel cell power generation systems installed
throughout the world today and, b) emerging applications of fiiel cell technology and industry trends. In 2006, the Fuel
Cell Working group intends to visit nearby fuel cell installations in Alameda and Sonoma counties to gain first hand
knowledge of stationary fuel cell power generation capabilities.
Vehicles
The County of Santa Clara Fleet Management Department continues to actively promote fuel efficiency and reduced
emissions within the Strategic Fleet Plan. The County has 39 Hybrid Vehicles, 50 Neighborhood Electric Vehicles, 26
Electric Forklifts and Electric Taylor Dunn Carts, and 9 Propane Forklifts. All are light duty for a total of 124
Alternative Fueled vehicles. The Fleet Department has been recognized and awarded $10,000 by the Bay Area Air
Quality Management Board for its purchases of Hybrid Vehicles.
The County of Santa Clara has participated in the California Fuel Cell Partnership to promote alternatives to gasoline
fueled vehicles within the County Fleet. In May 2005, the County co—hosted a Fuel Cell Vehicle demonstration and
workshop with the California Fuel Cell Partnership. In July 2005, the County submitted a letter ofintent to eight
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle manufacturers requesting acquisition of a demonstration vehicle. The Fleet Department is
awaiting notification of the status of this request.
Efforts of the Fleet Department to promote a mix of altematively fueled vehicles are consistent with approved Board
Policy 7.11 on Vehicle Procurement — Low Emission Vehicles (adopted 2-10-04). The Fleet Department continues
working towards the goal of improving fuel efficiency and thereby reduce fuel costs within the County Fleet. Fuel costs
have risen significantly in the past year and are anticipated to continue to be a souree of concern for the Fleet
Department budget. The Strategic Fleet Plan recognizes the budgetary and environmental impact of maintaining an
aging fleet offiiel inefficient vehicles and promotes the replacement of these vehicles when possible.
The County's Strategic Fleet Plan supports compliance with the California Environmental Protection Agency and the
California Air Resources Board particulate matter reduction efforts. Specifically, the County's 23 General Fund / Parks
diesel vehicles, identified as emitting particulate matter smaller than 10 microns in size, have been targeted for PM traps.
Particulate traps for 15 of the 23 diesel vehicles were installed in early November 2005. Installation and parts were
billed directly to BAAQMD under the BAAQMD PMIO retrofit grant program guidelines. The County is requesting
funding for installing particulate traps on the remaining 8 vehieles from the Air Quality Control Board's Carl Moyer
Memorial Attainment Program. Senate Bill 656 requires the reduction of diesel engine emissions by January 2007.
BACKGROUND
Board of SupeMsors; Donald F. Gage, Blanch Aivaradd. Pete ftlcHugh,Jirn Beail,Liz Khiss
County Executive: Pdter Kutras Jr.
Gommittee
2k?Mi5
Kaentia Keiii No. 15
The following chronological history provides a summary of activities in support of fuel cell advancement since the
adoption ofthe initiative.
09/14/04 - Board adopted the Santa Clara County Fuel Cell Advancement Initiative
10/15/04 - Application for CALTRANS Plarming Grant submitted
10/19/04 - Board approved Work Plan framework
01/09/05 - Mercury News Article -"A New Energy, Silicon Valley players are on the hunt for breakthroughs in
alternative-power technology —and venture capitalists are taking notice."
01/28/05 - Presentation to Fuel Cell Working Group by Chevron Texaco and FuelCell Energy,Inc.
03/01/05 - Board approved status report
03/01/05 - Administration submitted $2.5 million Earmark request
04/01/05 - Presentation to Fuel Cell Working Group by ION America
04/15/05 - Presentation to Fuel Cell Working Group by Plugpower Fuel Cell Systems
04/19/05 - Board delegated authority to Facilities and Fleet to submit letters ofinterest to acquire a fuel cell
demonstration vehicle
05/06/05 - County of Santa Clara and California Fuel Cell Partnership jointly demonstrated hydrogen fuel eell vehicles
to regional leaders
05/23/05 - Mercury News Article -"Jump Starting the Hydrogen Car Dream"
07/18/05 - Received rejection letter from CALTRANS Planning Grant
07/21/05 - Letter ofInterest to acquire a fuel cell vehicle submitted to the Operating Equipment Manufacturers
Members of the California Fuel Cell Partnership
08/19/05 - Status report to FGOC
10/14/05 - AB 1660 adopted. The County successfully supported this legislation.
11/22/05 - County representatives attended the FY 2007 BAAQMD Carl Moyer grant workshop for diesel emission
reduction strategies
12/08/05 - Fleet Manager attended eCivis Grants locater training for identifying potential grants associated with
municipal fleets, emissions reductions, and environmental impact projects
Board of SupetvlsbrsiDpriald'F.;Gage. Blanca Alvaradd, PetelcHugh,Jim:Beall, Liz Kriiss
Cdunt/Executive; Peter kutr^^^
Committee Agenda Date:February 2,2006
Agenda Kem No. 15
01/20/06 — County representatives attended the Sustainable Silicon V alley Educational Forum: Taking the C02 Out Of
Your Commute
02/01/06 -FAF representative attended Department ofEnergy's forum for Congressional Earmark recipient
organizations
02/02/06 - Status report to FGOC
rONSROTJENCES OF NEGATTVE ACTION
The Board will not have the most recent information regarding the status of the Fuel Cell Initiative.
ATTACHMENTS
'Board of SupervisprsfDoh^^^^
Gage/.Blanca^^
County Executive^Peter kutras'Jr.
Pete McHiigh,Jirri,:Beall, Liz Kiiiss
Quarterly report on the Fuel Cell Advancement Initiative with five recommendations with direction to the County Executive to Consider stationary fuel cell applications when planning for building projects and energy – system upgrades. Identify a fuel cell vehicle demonstration project and work with the California Fuel Cell Partnership to lease a vehicle to the County. Contract with a consultant to assist the County with planning for fuel cell implementation, and obtain grant funding for these consultant services. Consider sponsoring legislation related to fuel cell technology expansion and advancement of other clean distributed energy generation application. Participate in local and regional information – exchange forums with stake holders. Additionally, the report contains updates on the planning process for Site/Technology Selection and Outreach Program, financing, legislative, buildings, and vehicles.