BOB Agenda Date :June 1:3,: 2006

County of Santa Clara
Facilities And Fleet Department

FAFOl 061306

Prepared by: Caroline Judy
Manager,Intragovemmental
Support Services

DATE:

June 13, 2006

TO:

Board of Supervisors

FROM:

Larry Jinkins
Director of Facilities and Fleet Department

SUBJECT: Budget Letter #9: Alternative Uses of Williams Settlement Funds

RECOMMENDED ACTION

Accept report relating to budget workshop referral on alternate uses of Williams Settlement
Funds.

FISCAL TMPTJCATTONS

There are no fiscal impacts associated with accepting this report.
CONTRACT HISTORY

Not Applicable.

Bbard of Supervisors: Doriald P. Gage, BlancaAlvarad Pete McH.Ugh,Jim Beaii. LizKriiss
County Executive: Peter Kutras Ji".

BOS Agenda Date :June 13,2006

REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATTON

During Budget Workshops, Supervisors Gage and Kniss requested information on unfunded
energy conservation projects. Following the Finance and Government Operations Committee
meeting, Supervisor Kniss requested information on local firms doing business in the
alternative energy market segment, and the job growth potential for these markets. This
budget letter responds to both referrals.
a

BACKGROUND

Energy Conservation

Energy Conservation remains a high priority for the Facilities and Fleet Department(FAF).
Energy Conservation projects are annually proposed as part ofthe 10-Year Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP), and are recommended to the Board in relation to other projects
during the Capital Project review process.
In FY 2002, the Board of Supervisors created the Energy Task Force. Chaired by Supervisors
Kniss and McHugh,the task force identified and implemented many energy conservation
measures. In FY 2003, two million dollars were allocated to Energy Conservation projects in
the CIP.

Since FY 2003, Energy Conservation projects have been proposed each year but ultimately
have not received funding in the annual Capital Budget process. These decisions have resulted
from a shortage of one-time funds, and the prioritization of life safety and critical building
maintenance and County program issues. Although not prioritized for one-time funding.
Building Operations continues to replace HVAC systems and appliances with more energy
efficient models as part of the Backlog / Lifecycle Replacement maintenance program.
Funding for this maintenance program has been reduced by 33 % since FY 2002.
The attached list describes 141 unfunded energy conservation projects worth $11.6 million
with financial payback periods varying from less than one year to 12 years. As the list
demonstrates, Santa Clara County would realize a positive ongoing savings of $1.3 million
given a one-time $11.6 million investment in energy conservation. The $1.3 million in
ongoing savings would be greater if State incentives and rebates were included. Calculating

'Board of Supervisors: Donald f. Gage.,BlancaAlvaradb, Pete McHugh,Jim Beall, LizKriIss
County Executive: Peter Kutras-Jf.

BOS Agenda Date :Juh,e 13,2006,

rebate savings was beyond the scope of this referral.

Investment. Entrepreneurial Activity and .Tob Growth Potential in the Bay Area Alternative
Energy Market Segment

In an effort to "future proof or reduce risks associated with increasing energy costs, local
companies, Bay Area counties, and states nationwide are investing in a mix of energy cost
reduction strategies and efforts to reduce global warming including;
• energy conservation,

• on-site alternative energy production,
• reduced C02 emissions.

At a recent presentation to Sustainable Silicon Valley members, Alza Corporation described
how they are using methane from the Shoreline Amphitheater landfill to generate electricity,
thereby achieving grid independence, and reduced carbon emissions for a net investment of
$7.5 million. Cisco Systems has invested in energy conserving lighting fixtures saving $4.5
million in annual operating costs. Alameda County has invested in a one megawatt fuel
cell/photovoltaic system to power the County jail. Both public sector and private sector
entities face energy cost increases and future price volatility such that reducing energy costs
are a budget priority.

The Bay Area is host to several companies and venture capital investors at the leading edge of
"clean technology." Clean technology covers a range of industry segments from alternative
energy to water purification to advanced materials. Although not a comprehensive list, a few
of these local firms are described below:

• Aurora BioFuels (Berkeley, CA)- creating bio-diesel with 125 times higher yields and
50% lower costs than current production methods.

• Electro Automotive (Santa Cruz, CA)- a company that sells gas-to-electric
conversion kits for cars.

• Evogy Inc.(San Jose, CA)- a start-up company making tubular solid oxide fuel cell
systems

• Miasole (Santa Clara, CA)- a company that manufactures a thin-film photovoltaic
cell. It consists of an ultra-thin layer of photoactive material on a stainless steel foil that

Board of Supervisors:Donald F. Gage,Blahc:a Aivaradg, Pete fiflcHugh, Jirri Beaii, Liz Ktiiss
G0u nty Exec utive: P.ete r Kutras J r.

BOSAgenda Date jJune'l 3,2006.

can be incorporated into building materials.

• Nanosys and Nanosolar(Palo Alto, CA)- a company that creates flexible thin film
photovoltaic plastics that are spread across rooftops or built into building materials.

The Bay Area venture capital community continues to invest in clean technology, albeit this
support appears to be increasing at a slower rate relative to other areas of the nation.
Nationally, clean technology as a market segment now ranks 6th in size behind venture capital
investment in software, biotechnology, telecommimications, medical equipment, and
semiconductors. West Coast investment at $41 million has slipped to 4% of the over $1 billion
in national venture capital committed annually to clean technology.

California appears to lag other major states in creating incentives for local investment. A
recent study shows that other regions ofthe Country are more active than California in
establishing state and local incentives that encourage alternative energy investment,
development and demonstration projects. FAF staff compared the study results for California
with New York, Florida, Massachusetts and Ohio. The attached table illustrates-^the
differences in state and local incentives. Some highlights include:

• California has fairly comparable clean energy rebate programs ,but is weaker in
research and development support.

• Massachusetts offers a unique personal and income tax credit exemption for eamings
resulting from alternative energy or energy conservation patents.
• Pennsylvania has a dedicated State Venture Capital fund of $60 million that leverages
private equity of over $180 million.

Many of the locally supported demonstration projects in other states are offered to specific
local fuel cell vendors such as Plug Power in New York. New York clearly leads with more
stationary fuel cell demonstration projects outranking California almost two to one. Although
California has a strong venture capital base and an active entrepreneurial environment, this
does not appear to translate into stationary distributed generation demonstration projects. This
may be the result of the Governor's focus on Hydrogen Highway refueling and vehicle
projects instead of stationary fuel cell projects.

'Boafd Wsuperyis^^^^

GounYPx^ecutlveife^^

bage, Blanca Aivdrad'o,Pete mcHtigh, JjmlBeaii, Uiz Kniss

BOSjftgenda Date :dijne 13,2006

Other regions are using local incentives to attract firms and compete for future job growth in
the clean technology sector. Federal, state and local investment is widely believed to generate
significant job growth. The Renewable Energy Project, a Washington D.C. based nonprofit,
has studied job growth potential resulting from investment in wind and solar power. The study
indicates that a national investment in wind power has the potential to benefit 20 states. Those
states would receive 80% of the job creation. In an in-depth study for Ohio State,job growth
was analyzed for each of the individual manufacturing sectors involved in a wind turbine
project. The study concluded that an estimated 11,688 jobs would be created from a single
project.(See http://www.crest.org).
Summary

In summary,FAF administration recommends the County identify ongoing sources offunding
for both energy conservation and alternative power generation projects. Building Operations
has identified $11 million in Energy Conservation projects, many with payback periods of5
years or less. These projects will continue to be incorporated into the 10-Year Capital
Improvement Plan and will be evaluated during the annual Capital Budget process. In
addition, consistent with the Green Building Policy, Capital Programs will review potential
opportunities for alternative power generation on a project by project basis.
CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION
None.

STEPS EOET.OWTNG APPROVAL

None

ATTACHMENTS

•Comparative Analysis of California and 5 Other States
•List of Energy Projects

Board of Supervisors: Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete tvlcHugh, Jim Beali, LizKniss
G.ounty Executive: Peter Kutras Jr.

Comparative Analysis of California and 5 Other States
Stationary Distributed Power Generation Incentives
State

California

Incentives/Market Stimulation

R&D Support

Emerging Renewable Program Rebate $3.20/w for 30kW or less

Public Interest Energy Research Program

industrial Development Bond Financing

Energy Innovations Small Grant Program

State/Locally
Supported
Demonstration

Projects
16 projects

Grants

Program - below market rate loans up to $40
million per project
Self Generation incentive Program Rebate level 1 $4.50/w, level 2 $2.50/w
Massachusetts

Alternative Energy and Energy Conservation
Patent Exemption- personal and corporate
income tax deductions for patent income

Renewable Energy Trust $25 million investment
per year for 5 years

3 projects

Large Onsite Renewable Initiative - design,
construction and feasibility grants
Sustainable Energy Economic Development
initiative -loans

Massachusetts Green Power Partnership - long
term contracts for renewable energy credits
New Jersey

Clean Energy Rebate Program

Renewable Energy Business Venture
Assistance Program

4 projects

New York State Energy Research and
Development Authority - financial incentives

31 projects

Combined Heat and Power Program rebate
$4.00/w up to 1 MW

Renewable Energy Advanced Power Program seed grants
New York

Fuel Cell Electric Generating Equipment Tax
Credit - 20% of system cost for PEM only

New York Green Building Tax Credit- up to $2

Hydrogen Technology Demonstration Project -

million per building

$1.5 million in grants

Peak Load Reduction Program - grants for
projects 20Kw +

Power Systems Grant
New York Energy Smart Programs -grants
Combined Heat and Power Demonstration

project grants

Long Island Power Authority Clean Project
grants
New York Power Authority grants
Ohio

Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan Fund

Pennsylvania

Energy Harvest Grant Program

Third Frontier Project -10 Year investment of
$1.6 Billion in grant funds

4 projects

New PA Venture Capital Investment Fund - $60

3 projects

million

Governor's budget leverages $180 million
private equity
Sustainable Energy Funds - grants and loans

TRF Energy Fund - financing for non-profits
Pennsylvania Energy Development Authority grants, loans and loan guarantees

Source: Breakthrough Technologies institute, Inc. State Activities that Promote Fuel Ceils and Hvdrogen infrastructure Develooment.

UNFUNDED ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS
(June 5, 2006)
Simple Payback

Estimated

Annual '

. Facility #

■

Project Title •.

'

.

-Savings

Estimated
Costs

Cumulative
Costs.

in-years (after Rebates).

6187

Reprogram Elmwood Medical Processing Building Controls

$50,288

$32,009

'$32,009

0.6

6193

Reprogram Elmwood Admin Building Controls

$32,378

$64,288

$96,297

2.0

1309

Retrofit Mariposa Lodge Kitchen Evaporative AC

$1,332

$3,917

$100,213 -

2.9

6188

Install Elmwood W2 water control systems

$19,518

$57,940

$158,153'

3.0

6185

Reprogram Elmwood Programs Building Controls

$13,204

$43,354

.$201,507 -

3.3

6184

Retrofit Elmwood West Gate Lighting Controls

$1,837

$7,698

$209,205'

4.2

5908

Retrofit Juvenile Detention Lighting

$6,268

$27,856

$237,061

4.4

0916

Retrofit Park Alameda HVAC w/ High Efficiency Motors

$1,068

$4,970

$242,031

4.7

3102

Install Animal Shelter Energy Savings Ceiling

$2,870

$13,506

$255,537 :

4.7

0919

Install Timpany Center Pool Cover

$2,870

$13,506

5269,043

4.7

1324

Install Starlight Pool Cover

$2,870

$13,506

.. $282,549 C

4.7

5603

Relamp Berger Building 3 w/ High Eficiency Lighting

$10,218

$48,891

$331,440

4.8

$6,889

$33,765

$365,204

4.9

$574

$2,836

$368,041 .

4.9

1341-1347

Replace Mariposa Lodge Water Heaters w/lnstant Water Heaters

5100

Retrofit James Ranch Pool w/ Energy Cover

0209

Retrofit Superior Court HVAC w/ High Efficiency Motors

$1,607

$8,779

$376,819

5.5

0707

Relamp East Valley Public/ Mental Health

$11,367

$63,342

$440,162

5.6

Simple Payback'•

' Estimated
Annual

-Facility#.

.

ProjectTItlie

..Sayings

, Estimated
Coste. ..

Cumulative
Costs.

In years (after.Rebates),-

$540,780.

5.6

$36,961

$577,742 ;

5.5

$12,630

$72,027

$649,768;.

5.7

$20,667

$123,443

;$773,212'

6.0

$8,255

$49,323

$822,'535

6.0

$505

$3,106

$825,641 .

6.1

Convert Men's Work Furlough Water Heaters

$5,281

$33,494

$859,136

6.3

5910

Retrofit Probation - Lobby Wing Air Handling Units

$1,481

$9,420

$868,556.

6.4

0935

Retrofit Medical Examiner DX Units

$9,300

$59,628

$928,184,

6.4

0960

install Children's Shelter Laundry Heat/Water Recovery system

$2,641

$17,423

$945,607

6.6

0730

Convert Alexian Drive Complex Methadone Water Heaters

$551

$3,782

$949,388

6.9

6184

Retrofit Elmwood West Gate DX Units

$1,378

$9,724

$959,113

7.1

6193

Reprogram Elmwood Admin Building Lighting Controls

$6,544

$46,730

$1,005,843

7.1

6187

Convert Elmwood Medical Processing Air Handlers

$16,533

$121,147

$1,126,990'

7.3

6191

Retrofit Elmwood M4/M5 Air Handling Units

$18,829

$137,895

3101

Convert San Martin Drug Abuse Water Heater

$367

6173

Retrofit Elmwood WDFAA/1 DX Units

$4,707

$18,026

$100,618

$6,734

Retrofit Park Alameda DX Units

5903

Replace Juvenile Probation VAV Box

2110

Retrofit Men's Work Furlough DX Units

0916

Convert Park Alameda Water Heater

2110

5602

Retrofit Berger 2 Circulating Pumps

5903

Reprogram Juvenile Probation Building controls

0916

.$1j264;885

7.3

$2,701

$^;267,58i

7.4

$34,980

$1,302,566

7.4

Simple Payback' v.

Estimated

Annual

Project Title

Facility #

Savings,

Estimated. Cumulative

..Costs

Costs

in'years (after Rebates)

$6,774

$49,972

$1,352,537 n

7.4

$312,970

$2,341,101

$3',693,638

7.5

Retrofit Haii of Justice Water Pumps

$4,994

$37,600

:$$j731,238

7.5

0105

Replace HOJ-West Municipal Court HVAC Motor

$1,309

$9,792

0105

Retrofit HOJ-West Municipal Court Coll Valves

$8,654

$64,625

5601

Retrofit Berger 1 w/ High efficiency Lighting

$19,174

5903

Isolate Juvenile Probation Boiier

6188

6187

Retrofit Eimwood Medical Processing DX Units

6189

Retrofit Eimwood W3A/V4 Air Handlers

0103

b,-741,030.

7.5

'$3,805,655

7.5

$144,647

$3,950,303

7.5

$1,729

$12,966

$3,963,268

7.5

Retroit Eimwood W2 Air Handiing Units

$8,726

$65,503

$4,028,772

7.5

6187

Reprogram Eimwood Medical Processing Lighting Controls

$4,707

$35,926

$4,064,697'

7.6

6191

Retroit Eimwood M4/M5 DX Units

$12,859

$97,647

$4,162,344-'

7.6

5603

Convert Berger 3 to VAV

$23,011

$178,142

$4,340,486

7.7

6189

Retrofit Eimwood W3/W4 Evaporative Cooling

$19,748

$152,211

$4,492,697

7.7

0500

Convert Women's Residential Heat Pumps

$28,095

$219,740

$4,712,437;

7.8

6185

Retrofit Eimwood Programs HVAC Motors

$1,722

$13,641

$4,726,078:

7.9

3102

Relamp San Martin Animai Sheiter High Efficiency Lighting

$1,045

$8,320

.$4,734;397

8.0

6188

Retrofit Eimwood W2 DX Units

$5,970

$47,811

$4,782,208

8.0

3101

Replace San Martin Offices Cooling Colls

$9,300

$74,687

$4;856i895

8.0

Simple: Payback

• Estimated
'' .Annual

/,Pr<^ectTitle

••Facility#

s;■

Estimated,

Savings

Costs

$1,079

t

Cumulative
Costs

- In years (after Rebates)

$8,698

$4;865,S93

8.1

$402

$3,241

$4,868,834

8.1

'

.

3101

Reiamp San Martin Pediatrics Lighting

2902

Convert West Valley Mental Health Water Heaters

0707

Retrofit East Valley Public Health DX Units

$4,133

$33,494

$4,902,329

8.1

0404

Isolate Sheriff Department Boiler

$1,578

$12,966

$4,915,295

8.2

0501

Retrofit Communications Water Pumps

$1,607

$13,236

$4,928,530

8.2

0935

Convert Medical Examiner Air Handier

$4,443

$37,033

$4,965,563

8.3

0404

Retrofit Sheriff Department CHWP VFD

$1,652

$13,865

$4,979,428 .

8.4

0711

Retrofit VMC - East Valley Clinic Pump Drives

$1,607

$13,506

$4,992,934

8.4

1309

Retrofit Mariposa Lodge DX Units

$2,136

$18,003

$5,010,937

8.4

2902

Retrofit West Valley Mental Health Rooftop HVAC

$700

$5,970

$5,016,M7.

8.5

5601

Retrofit Berger 1 Pumps

$2,296

$19,719

$5,036,625

8.6

6186

Retrofit Elmwood Support Services HVAC Motors

$4,707

$40,653

$5,077,278

8.6

6189

Retrofit Elmwood W3/W4 HVAC Motors

$4,478

$38,627

$5,115,905

8.6

6193

Retrofit Elmwood Admin Building DX Units

$5,067

$44,164

$5,160,069

8.7

6184

Retrofit Elmwood West Gate Air Handlers

$1,607

$13,911

^ $5,173,980.

8.7

6186

Retrofit Elmwood Support Services Compressors

$6,430

$56,454

$5,230,434

8.8

1309

Convert Mariposa Lodge Water Heater

$1,412

$12,425

$5,242,860

8.8

Simple Payback

. Estimated

Project Title

Facility #.

; Annual
.{Shavings

Estimated
Costs:

Cumulative-

Costs .

in years'(after Rebates)-

0960

Convert Children's Shelter Water Heater

$1,401

$12,425

$5,255,285

8.9

0710

Retrofit East Valley Mental Health SNF DX Units

$5,683

$50,512

$5,305,797

8.9

2005

Retrofit North County Court Building Motors

$1,894

$16,869

-$5]322,665.^

8.9

0916

Install Park Alameda Economizers

$2,136

$19,016

$5,341,682

8.9

0710

Install East Valley Mental Health SNF Economizer

$4,443

$39,802

. $5^381,483

9.0

0102

Retrofit CCOB West Wing Cooling Tower VFD

$4,363

$39,707

$5,421,191

9.1

0501

Retrofit Communications HVAC Motors

$2,985

$27,147

$5,448,337

9.1

6170

Retrofit Elmwood M2/M3 Air Handlers

$9,644

$86,978

$5,535,315

9.0

6185

Retrofit Elmwood Programs DX Units

$2,296

$20,799

$5,556,114:

9.1

0916

Install Park Alameda Water Pumps

$3,674

$33,535

1324

Convert Starlight Water Heaters

$1,389

$12,695

0404

Relamp Sheriff Department

$24,204

$221,409

"$5,823,753

9.1

5903

Relamp Juvenile Probation

$14,289

$130,709

$5,954,463

9.1

3102

Install San Martin Animal Shelter Thermostats

$643

$5,943

$5,960^405

9.2

6185

Convert Elmwood Programs Air Handlers

$5,626

$52,268

$6,012,673

9.3

6100

Install Elmwood Modular Buildings Lighting Controls

$4,363

$41,058

$6,053,731

9.4

6173

Retrofit Elmwood WDF/W1 HVAC Motors

$12,630

$118,446

$6,172,177

9.4

45,589,649
$5,602,344.

9.1

9.1

Simple Payback

Estimated.

- -Annual .

Facility #

Project Title

.

' ' ; ;Sayings '

Estimated

. Cumulative'

.Costs

•

Costs

in years(after Rebates)'

0501

Retrofit Cortimunications Spiit System

$2,526

$24,040

$6;196,217

9.5

0500

Convert Women's Residential Water Heater

$1,068

$10,224

$6,206,441

9.6

0935

Retrofit Medicai Examiner HVAC Motors

$884

$8,495

$6gl4f936

9.6

0711

Retrofit VMC - East Vaiiey Clinic Chiller

$17,522

$168,958

$6,383,894

9.6

5909

Retrofit Juvenile Probation Office Wing Air Handling Units

$1,755

$16,869

$6,400,763

9.6

6160

Install Elmwood M8 water control systems

$20,092

$192,998

$6,693,761

9.6

6170

Install Elmwood M2/M3 water control systems

$74,277

$710,585

$7,304,346'

9.6

3101

Convert San Martin Main Building Air Handlers

$5,304

$51,187

■$7,35'5,533=.

9.6

5602

Upgrade Berger 2 HVAC Motors

$4,363

$42,543

-$7,398,0>7'

9.8

6160

Retrofit Elmwood M8 Air Handlers

$12,285

$120,607

$7;518,684."

9.8

6170

Retrofit Elmwood M2/M3 DX Units

$6,544

$63,883

$7,582,566

9.8

6170

Retrofit Elmwood M2/M3 HVAC Motors

$2,181

$21,339

$7,603,905 -

9.8

6188

Retrofit Elmwood W2 HVAC Motors

$1,607

$15,802

$7,619,707 :

9.8

$0

$220,000

$7,839,707

TBD

Various

Energy improvements Analyses (Optimization of systems)

1324

Install Starlight Evaporative Unit

$2,583

$25,661

$7,865,368

9.9

1301

Convert Wright Ranch Water Heater

$1,079

$10,724

r $7,876,092

9.9

0105

Retrofit HOJ-West Municipal Court Air Damper

$1,676

$16,842

$7,892,934

10.0

Simple Payback .

Estimated

~

ProjectTitle

Facility#

Annual

Savings

.

Estirhated

. ; Costs .

Cuinuiative
Costs

'in years (after Rebates)!

6173

Retrofit Elmwood WDF/W1 Evaporative Unit

$7,004

$69,960

$7,962,894

10.0

0500

Retrofit Women's Residential DX Units

$1,814

$18,260

$7,981,154

10.1

1324

Retrofit Starlight Pump

$4,638

$46,717

$8,027,870

10.1

6185

Reprogram Elmwood Programs Lighting Controls

$3,904

$39,437

$8,067,307

10.1

5100

Retrofit James Ranch Evaporative Cooling

$4,971

$50,444

$8,117,752

10.1

0960

Consolidate Children's Shelter Electric meters

$16,235

$165,041

$8,282,793

10.2

3101

Install San tyiartin Offices Economizer

$2,836

$29,335

$8i312,128'

10.3

6173

Install Elmwood WDF/W1 Water Control system

$8,381

$86,842

$8,398]970

10.4

6189

Install Elmwood W3rtA/4 Water Control System

$16,763

$173,550

$8,572,520;

10.4

2005

Retrofit North County Court Building Air Flandlers

$746

$7,739

'$8,580,259

10.4

0920

Install Traffic Court Economizers

$3,008

$31,361

$8,611,619

10.4

6186

Relamp Elmwood Support Services

$11,596

$121,823

$8,733,442

10.5

1301

Convert Wright Ranch Water Heaters

$321

$3,430

$8,736,873

10.7

0960

Retrofit Children's Shelter DX Units

$896

$9,562

$8,746,435

10.7

2904

Install Los Gatos Superior Court Economizers

$1,320

$14,127

$8,760,562

10.7

6160

Retrofit Elmwood M8 DX Units

$8,381

$89,274

^:$8,849,835

10.7

3101

Convert San Martin Drug Abuse Heat Pumps

$4,202

$45,109

$8,894,945

10.7

. .'Simple Payback

Estimated .
' Annual

'Facility #-

^

."i, '. -. nnnn •'

J

Project Title

"" „

, / <•'

Estimated'

Savings

Costs

-

Cumulative'

. Costs' ,' 'in years (afteriRebates)-

2005

Instaii North County Court Building VFD

$2,606

$28,011

$8,922,956

10.7

5100

Retrofit James Ranch DX Units

$2,664

$29,213

$8;9S2;169

11.0

1309

Consolidate MaripOsa Lodge HVAC Units

$2,595

$28,497

$8,980,666

11.0

0920

Retrofit Traffic Court DX Units

$3,961

$44,043

$^024,709

11.1

1301

Consolidate Wright Ranch HVAC Units

$2,308

$25,702

$9,050,410

11.1

0707

Instaii East Valley Public Health / Mental Health Energy Management Syste

$11,826

$132,357

$9,182,768

11.2

6186

Instaii Elmwood Support Services HeatA/Vater Recovery System

$2,506

$28,092

; $9,210,860

11.2

1301

Retrofit Wright Ranch DX Units

$1,527

$17,071

$9,227,931

11.2

1309

Install Mariposa Lodge Econimizers

$2,641

$29,578

$9,257,509'

11.2

0960

Relamp Children's Shelter w/ High Efficiency Lights

$5,660

$63,450

$9,320,959'

11.2

1309

Convert Mariposa Lodge Heat Pumps

$1,481

$16,612

$9,337,571

11.2

2507

Retrofit Santa Clara Court HVAC Motors

$356

$4,038

.$9,34i;610

11.3

2902

Retrofit West Valley Mental Health DX Units

$815

$9,279

$9,350,888

11.4

0500

Instaii Women's Residential Thermostats

$15,985

$184,220

$9,535,108

11.5

2904

Retrofit Los Gatos Superior Court DX Units

$1,630

$18,692

$9,553,800

11.5

0730

Retrofit Aiexian Methadone Clinic DX Units

$804

$9,238

$9,563,038:

11.5

6100

Retrofit Elmwood Modular Building Heat Pumps

$5,511

$63,342

. $9,626,380.

11.5

Estimated
; AnnuaL"
_ Facility #

,0

. .. "

'r n Project Title n

Savings."!

• )Sirhple Payback
Estimated. Cumulative
Costs.
Costs.. „

11.6

$117,366

$9,752,795

11.6

$459

$5,402

$9,758,197

11.8

$140,814

$1,657,534

$11,415,731

11.8

$5,741

$67,529

$11,483,260

11.8

$770

$9,319

$11,492,579

12.1

$2,985

$36,331

$11^528,910

12.2

$150,000

$11,678,910

TBD

$9,049

$10,104

Retrofit East Valley Clinic HVAC Motors

0101

Isolate East Wing Lobby 1st Floor HVAC

1324

Install Timpany Center Pool Humidity Sensor

0404

Retrofit Sheriff DepartmentHVAC Motors

6185

Relamp Elmwood Programs w/ High Efficiency Lights

5100

Alterations to James Ranch Kitchen Refrigerated Storage

Convert East Valley Mental Health SNF Water Heater

0707

Convert East Valley Public / Mental Health VAV

0711

TBD

$1,396,671

Note 1
Note 2

in years(after Rebates)

. $9,635,429

$781

0710

K

$11,678,910

FAF researched with Chevron doing Co-generation plants at the Main Jail and Elmwood. As of this date, neither project is viabie.
Cun-ently FAF has installed these units in M4 & M5,further installations depend on evaluation of these installations.