Report Back County Energy Conservation Achievements
BOS Agenda Date: October 5,2004
Agenda Item No. 38
County of Santa Clara
Facilities And Fleet Department
Capital Programs
FAF02 100504
Prepared by: Lin Ortega
Interim Manager, GSA
Building Operations
DATE:
October 5, 2004
TO:
Board of Supervisors
FROM:
LaiTy Jinkins
Director of Facilities and Fleet Department
SUBJECT:
Report Back - County Energy Conservation Achievements
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Accept this informational report regarding the achievements of the County Energy
Conservation Program.
ETSCAE IMPLICATIONS
There is no impact to the General Fund as a result of accepting this report.
CONTRACT HTSTORY
Board of Supervisors: Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete McHugh,Jim Beall, Liz Kniss
Counf/ Executive; Peter Kutras Jr.
1
BOS Agendia Date;October 5,2004
Agenda Item No.38
Not applicable.
REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATTON
A referral was made at the August 3, 2004 Board of Supervisors meeting regarding the County's level of success in
reducing its electrical energy consumption. This report provides that information and additional supplemental
information.
BACKGROUND
In 2001, the State of California was faced with the worst energy crisis of recent history. On May 15, 2001, as a result of
the energy crisis, the Board of Supervisors formed the Emergency Energy Task Force(EETF)committee, co-chaired by
Supervisors Pete McHugh and Liz Kniss, to reduce the County's consumption of energy. The EETF committee directed
the former General Services Agency(GSA)to carry out a number of very important measures designed to conserve
energy usage in County facilities and to alleviate the need for rotating power outages. The EETF committee set an initial
energy conservation goal of 10%, which was subsequently raised to 20% because of the continued dismal power supply
projections by the State's energy providers. Successful implementation of these measures required the commitment and
leadership of each and every County agency and department director, as well as concerted action and some sacrifices by
every employee.
As a result of these extensive efforts, the County's consumption of electrical energy was 19.8 % lower in Fiscal Year
2004 then it was in Fiscal Year 2001. The Fiscal Year 2001 electrical consumption was 101,701,934 kWh. The Fiscal
Year 2004 consumption was 81,577,581 kWh.
Attachment 1 summarizes the energy consumption for the County's four major electrical accounts for Fiscal Years 2000
through 2004. The data and graphs show that the County was able to reduce its electrical energy consumption by 20.3 %
for these four major building complexes from FY 2000 to FY 2004.
Altogether, the County met its 20 % reduction goal.
GSA provided periodic progress reports to the EETF from the time the EETF was formed in 2001 until it was
discontinued in 2002. GSA continued providing reports to the Finance and Government Operations Committee(FGOC)
from 2002 until the present. The following is a summation of some of the information that was provided in those reports.
During the past three years the County has:
1. Completed over 500 individual energy conservation projects designed to reduce the County's gross power
consumption and to reduce peak power demand.
2. Installed real-time electrical power meters.
3. Initiated work on the facilities Enterprise Energy Management System.
4. Analyzed energy usage in County occupied facilities and implemented energy reduction measures.
Board of Supeivisors: Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete McHugh,Jim Beall, Liz Kniss
County Executive: Peter Kutras Jr.
2
BOS Agenda Date:October 5,2004
Agenda Item No. 38
5. Recommended County Purchasing Policies for purchasing energy efficient equipment.
6. Initiated the County's participation in PG&E's Energy Savings by Design program.
7. Analyzed and recommended alternatives for peak and gross energy demand reductions in the County.
8. Conducted energy audits of County facilities.
9. Studied the feasibility of using co-generation power plants.
10. Studied the feasibility of using alternative renewable power sources.
11. Implemented a County-wide Energy Savings Suggestion Program.
12. Subscribed to available rebate and incentive programs to help finance some of the County's energy conservation
efforts.
13. Created an Energy web site for suggestions and power supply status.
Projects and Energy Conservation Measures
Since 2001, the County has completed over 500 energy conservation projects at a cost of approximately $3.2 million
(see Attachment 2). Such projects have included;
a. Installation of 6,800 task lighting motion sensors;
b. Installation of 1,459 room lighting motion sensors;
c. Installation of new lighting controls systems in eight buildings;
d. Rewiring of lighting circuits to allow for uniform lighting;
e. Optimization of HVAC air intake economizers to take advantage of cool outside air thus reducing the need for
mechanically cooled air;
f Installation of 116 HVAC system time clocks and programmable thermostats;
g. Replacement of 139 incandescent exit signs with energy efficient LED (light emitting diode) exit signs;
h. Installation of reflective film on windows;
i. Installation of 23 cool roof systems;
j. Installation of boiler controls for more efficient gas usage on boiler systems;
k. Installation of attic fans;
Board of Supervisors: Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete McHugh,Jim Beall, Liz Kniss
Countjf Executive: Peter Kutras Jr.
3
BOS Agenda Date: October 5,2004
Agenda lten» No. 38
1. Installation of automatic tube brush cleaning systems for chillers;
m. Installation of 69 power meters;
n. Replacement of two water pumping stations; and
o. Retrofit of 716 lighting fixtures with energy efficient fluorescent lamps.
Installation of Real-Time Electrical Power Meters
On June 25, 2002, the Board of Supervisors approved the Power Meter Installation Project by awarding the contract to
Control Manufacturing Company(CMC). This project was approved as Phase One of a two-phase program, and was
done to measure consumption at specific buildings and to evaluate the quality and consistency of power being provided
by PG&E.Prior to the installation of these power meters, the County did not have a means to readily track energy
demand and could only rely upon data being provided by PG&E and other local utility providers. This project consisted
of installing 69 power meters, and was completed in December 2002. Attachment 3 provides a listing of sites where
power meters were installed.
Enterprise Energy Management System
Phase Two of the effort describe above is the installation of the Enterprise Energy Management System (EEMS). The
EEMS is the overall system that will give the County the ability to properly manage and control its electrical utilities,
and the potential to participate in load shedding energy rebate incentive programs. This system will enable the County to
control building power usage from the Building Operations MAC Room. The Board approved the funding for this
project at the August 3, 2004 Board Meeting. An RFP is being prepared.
Energy Usage in Countv Occupied Facilities
On June 8, 2001, the EETF requested GSA to establish and manage the County Energy Conservation Program, which
consists of managing energy conservation projects and work orders, and identifying other potential means to reduce the
County's energy consumption.
In addition to completing many energy conservation projects, GSA also analyzed building occupancy and employee
work schedules, and provided recommendations on possible alternatives that would lead to lower energy consumption in
some County buildings. GSA's analysis concluded with the recommendation to the EETF that the building utility
operating schedules be modified as opposed to other alternatives such as changing work schedules for employees or
closing buildings. This recommendation focused on operating building electrical systems at full capacity only during
actual working hours. This alternative proved to be the least disruptive to County workloads and mandated services
while being effective in terms of energy savings. For example - 2,473 kWh were saved per day by changing the 70 W
Hedding East Wing building systems operating hours from the former operating hours of 5 am to 2 am to new operating
hours of6 am to 9 pm.
Procurement Policies
GSA Procurement Department, with Board approval, developed and implemented new purchasing energy conservation
friendly policies. Such policy recommendations included the requirement that all electrical/electronic devices purchased
Board of Supervisors; Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete McHugh,Jim Beall, Liz Kniss
County Executive: Peter Kutras Jr.
4
BOS Agenda Date; October 5,2004
Agenda ttetn No.38
must be Energy Star rated.
Capital Programs Savings by Design
PG&E manages a "Savings by Design" program by which utility users may receive financial rebates by designing
buildings that achieve energy conservation goals that are greater than those required by California Title 24 standards.
The Capital Programs Division is participating in this program for each of the Bond funded programs. The Valley
Specialty Center is the first facility to receive recognition under the "Savings by Design" program. That facility has been
designed to achieve energy consumption that is 18 % lower than the Title 24 requirements. This will save the County an
estimated $254,000 in annual energy costs and makes the County eligible to receive a $150,000 PG&E rebate when the
project is completed.
Gross and Peak Load Reductions
GSA investigated and reported on various alternatives to reduce the County's peak and gross electrical consumption and
provided recommendations for each. Gross energy consumption reductions were identified as permanent reductions
which typically involved permanent alterations to the building systems. Peak energy consumption reductions involved
temporary changes designed to alleviate load demand during high consumption/low power supply periods (i.e., Stages 2
and 3). Some of the efforts undertaken to reduce gross energy demand were described earlier in this report. Another
important example would be the changing of temperature set-points in many buildings to 78 degrees for cooling and 68
degrees for heating for the peak period summer months and 70 degrees for heating and 76 degrees for cooling in the
peak winter months. Since 2002, the temperature set points where changed to remain at 70/76 throughout the year
instead of changing them seasonally.
Peak load reductions included alternatives such as reducing lighting levels where practical and operating emergency
power generators as a means of load shedding to alleviate the power grid during high demand/low power supply
conditions. This last alternative (use of emergency power generators) was discontinued upon learning of the air pollution
restrictions imposed by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District(BAAQMD). Because this was a very efficient
and direct way to reduce load, GSA investigated filter alternatives for its emergency generators so that these could be
operated when needed and still comply with the BAAQMD strict air quality guidelines. The generator filter alternative
proved to be too costly to implement.
Energy Audits
In efforts to compile a comprehensive list of energy conservation measures, the EETF recommended that GSA perform
comprehensive facility energy audits. GSA issued a REP to prospective bidders and eventually secured the services of
Chevron Energy Solutions(Chevron) at a cost of $355,316. Chevron performed energy audits on approximately 145
County owned buildings covering over 3.6 million square feet(see Attachment 4). Chevron's energy audits yielded a
number of Energy Conservation Measures(ECM)projects that were recommended for further evaluation. Examples of
such projects included lighting retrofits, EIVAC system modifications, installation of co-generation plants, and water
conservation measures. GSA evaluated the proposed projects against the financial criteria of available rebates, grants,
and payback periods. The County has completed five of these projects at a cost of $756,295 (see Attachment 5). One
project remains to be completed. This is the Berger 2 Chiller project approved by the Board on August 3, 2004 at a value
of $278,200. This last project will bring the total investment in Chevron recommended projects to $1,034,495.
Co-Generation Power Plants
Board of Supervisors: Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete McHugh,Jim Beall, Liz Kniss
County Executive: Peter Kutras Jr.
5
BOS Agenda Date; October 5,2004
Agenda Item No. 38
The consulting firm of Kuhn and Kuhn was hired to provide an analysis of the Chevron recommended project for
installation of co-generation plants at the Main Jail North and Elmwood facilities. Co-generation was recommended for
evaluation because the 24/7 operation of these two correctional facilities provided a constant load and had a higher
potential for producing positive savings as a result. Unfortunately, the Kuhn and Kuhn analysis showed these projects
were not economically viable projects and produced no immediate or mid-range savings. The project financing,
operating and maintenance costs were higher than the savings achieved.
Alternative Renewable Energy Resources
Being sensitive to the effects that power generation plants produce on the environment, and the potential for minimal
recurring investments to acquire power generation means, the EETF committee requested that GSA research alternative
renewable energy resources and study the possibility of installing such systems in County owned facilities. Reports on
the various alternative energy resources, such as solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, and fuel cells were generated by
Kuhn and Kuhn and were presented to the FGOC in 2002.
Countvwide Energy Savings Suggestion Program
In efforts to involve all County employees, the EETF Committee implemented the County-wide Energy Savings
Suggestion Program. This program proved very successful, particularly during the early to mid stages of the energy
conservation efforts. This program yielded in excess of 300 energy conservation suggestions during this time period.
Rebate Updates
According to PG&E records, the County had received over $1.7 million in rebates from 1990 to 1999. The magnitude of
these rebates show that the County was heavily involved in energy conservation projects prior to the 2001 energy crisis.
Since the 2001 energy crisis, the County has received a total of $391,758 in energy and water conservation related
rebates (see Attachment 6). These rebates have been generated as a result of subscriptions made by the County to the
different incentive programs offered by entities such as PG&E,California Energy Commission, and other program
sponsors such as the City of San Jose (for water conservation). Thus far in FY05, the County has received $36,108, and
is expecting an additional $50,000 before the end of the fiscal year. Including the anticipated rebate of $50,000, the
County's total for energy and water conservation related rebates will be $441,758 before the end of the current fiscal
year. The County will be receiving a $150,000 rebate under the PG&E Savings by Design program when the Valley
Specialty Center is completed in FY 07.
Current Energy Conservation Projects
The FAF Building Operations Division has programmed two energy conservation projects for FY05: 1) the HVAC
related project for Building 2 at Berger Drive, and 2)installation of the EEMS.
The HVAC project programmed for Berger 2 involves adding a small chiller to support the main computer room during
off hours. Currently this room is supported by a much larger chiller system that also supports other parts of the facility,
even when not needed. The installation of this smaller chiller will provide sufficient cooling for the computer room and
will operate at a much lower electrical cost. This measure is expected to generate about $29K in annual energy savings
and $50,000 in one-time energy rebates.
Board of Supervisors: Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete McHugh, Jim Beall, Liz Kniss
County Executive; Peter Kutras Jr.
6
BOS Agenda Date: October 5,2004
Agenda Item No. 38
The installation of the EEMS is phase two of the two-phase EEMS project described earlier in the report. The first phase
consisted of installing 69 additional real-time electrical power meters; this second phase involves installing the EEMS
system and linking all the power meters installed during phase one to existing computerized building control systems
(e.g., GE TLC Lighting controls, Andover, Johnson Controls, etc.) to provide true energy management capabilities. The
total project cost to implement this system will be $313,000; these are Fund 50 funds that have already been allocated
and approved by the Board of Supervisors.
FAF Capital Programs Division is continuing to pursue efforts under the PG&E Savings by Design program for the
Bond funded projects. The Crime Laboratory is currently being studied for means to exceed the energy conservation
goals of California Title 24 and eligibility for the PG&E Savings by Design program.
CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION
If this report is not accepted, the Board will not have the most recent information regarding the County's success in
reducing its electrical energy consumption.
STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors will forward one conformed copy of this transmittal to the Facilities and Fleet
Department, Intergovernmental Services Division, 2310 North First Street San Jose , CA.
ATTACHMENTS
•(Transmittal submitted on Sep 23, 2004 12:00:06 PM - PDF Version)
• Attachment 1 -Energy Savings Summary (Miscellaneous)
• Attachment 2 -Energy
Conservation Projects Matrix (Miscellaneous)
• Attachment 3 -Power Meter Installations (Miscellaneous)
• Attachment 4 -Chevron Audited Facilities (Miscellaneous)
• Attachment 5 -CES Energy
Conservation Measures (Miscellaneous)
• Attachment 6 -Rebates to Date (Miscellaneous)
Board of Supervisors: Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete McHugh,Jim Beall, Liz Kniss
Counts' Executive: Peter Kutras Jr.
7
Attachment 1
Energy Savings Summary
(Savings reflected compare FYOO to rY04)
FY
FY’OO
FY’01
FY’02
FY’03
FY’04
180
171
55
Berger Dr.
Hedding
Hedding
Younger
Total
10,848,270
10,326,170
18,788,055
526,960
13,453,336
43,616,621
15,016,800
8,410,455
8,542,944
8,977,768
13,447,200
13,485,600
13,588,800
769,440
604,320
16,523,057
10,684,788
42,635,467
33,146,763
641,920
591,280
11,150,310
11,590,996
33,820,774
34,748,844
% Savings
Energy Reduction Comparison between FYOO and FY04:
Total
50,000,000 n
45,000,000 40,000,000 -
35,000,000 30,000,000 Total
25,000,000 20,000,000 -
15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0
FYOO
FYD1
FYD2
FYD3
FYD4
The data above includes the following buildings:
55
Berger Dr.
180 Hedding
171 Hedding
Younger
Sheriffs
Berger 1
Office
Main Jail North
Berger 2
Main Jail South
Berger 3
HOJ East &West
Roads &
Juvenile Hall
Airports
Complex
Parking
Garage
West Wing
East Wing
Fleet
Garage
Fleet Office
-20.33%
Attachment 6
(Rebates To Date)
Cost
Year/ Payment From
Center
Date
Log #
Amount
GL Acct
36,108.78
4723550
2516
8/13/04
002463
4723550
FY 05
CHEVRONTEXACO (Energy Rebate)
YTD Rebates FY05
$36,108.78
FY 04
2516
06/22/04
020289
4723550
2516
06/22/04
020289
4723550
2516
07/29/03
001579
4723550
2516
08/26/03
003195
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
$14,172.40
$50,000.00
$3,153.00
$3,153.00
$3,153.00
4723550
2516
10/16/03
006117
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
$153.00
4723550
2516
12/03/03
008698
4723550
2516
12/30/03
010140
4723550
2516
01/13/04
010866
4723550
2500
02/27/04
013439
4723550
2516
03/26/04
015146
2516
04/20/04
016521
4723550
2516
06/08/04
019479
$156.75
9771
2515
01/02/00
4913
$4,500.00
$1,080.00
$780.00
$2,310.00
$1,200.00
9771
2515
07/24/01
1450
9771
2515
07/24/01
1451
9771
2515
07/24/01
1450
9771
2515
07/24/01
1450
9771
2515
07/24/01
1449
$90.00
9771
2515
07/24/01
1449
$15,270.00
$13,350.00
$13,230.00
$19,500.00
$4,503.00
$715.00
$5,593.50
$2,640.00
$2,400.00
$1,800.00
$8,370.00
$7,650.00
$1,050.00
$2,029.50
$5,550.00
$9,000.00
$4,650.00
$24,000.00
$99.00
9771
2515
07/24/01
1449
9771
2515
07/24/01
1449
9771
2515
07/24/01
1449
9771
2515
07/24/01
1451
9771
2515
07/24/01
1451
9771
2515
07/24/01
1451
9771
2515
07/24/01
1447
9771
2515
07/24/01
1450
9771
2515
07/24/01
1449
9771
2515
07/24/01
1450
9771
2515
07/24/01
1447
9771
2515
07/24/01
1447
9771
2515
07/24/01
1450
9771
2515
07/24/01
1447
9771
2515
07/24/01
1448
9771
2515
07/24/01
1451
9771
2515
07/24/01
1448
9771
2515
07/24/01
1448
9771
2515
07/24/01
1447
CHEVRONTEXACO
CITY OF SAN JOSE
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
Total Rebates FY04
$3,153.00
$3,153.00
$3,153.00
$3,153.00
$3,153.00
$3,153.00
$92,702.40
4723550
FY 01 - FY03(Previously Reported)
PG&E Ck#8632765
PG&E 976 Lenzen Ck#8366782
PG&E 976 Lenzen Ck#188017
PG&E 850 Thornton Ck#8366783
PG&E 701 Abel Ck#8366802
PG&E 614 Tully Ck#8366793
PG&E 590 East Middlefield Ck#8366784
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8366794
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8366797
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8366801
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8366779
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8354985
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8355095
PG&E 4525 Union #10A Ck#8366787
PG&E 4525 Union #10A Ck#8366781
PG&E 298 Garden Hill Ck#8366780
PG&E 2700 Carol Ck#8366789
PG&E 2645 Zanker Ck#8366796
PG&E 2610 N. 1st St #201 Ck#8366796
PG&E 1989 McKee Ck#8366791
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8366785
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8366799
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8366778
PG&E 1735 N. 1st St. Ck#8366798
PG&E 1725 Technology Ck#8366790
PG&E 1555 Berger Drive Ck#8366795
PG&E 1555 Berger Drive
PG&E 1555 Berger Drive
PG&E 1555 Berger Drive
PG&E 1555 Berger Drive
Ck#8366803
Ck#8366800
Ck#8366792
Ck#8366786
PG&E 217 Devcon Ck#8384912
PG&E 95 W. Younger Ck#8410236
PG&E 701 Abel Ck#8407279
PG&E 660 S. Fairoaks Ck#8410242
PG&E 660 S. Fairoaks Ck#8410240
PG&E 590 East Middlefield Ck#8407282
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8410229
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8410228
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8407283
PG&E 298 Bernal Rd Ck#8407280
PG&E 1989 McKee Ck#8410241
PG&E 19050 Malaguerra Ave Ck#8407281
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8410230
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8410239
PG&E 298 Garden Hill Ck#8431380
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8431381
PG&E Ck#8407278
PG&E 850 Thornton Ck#8437841
PG&E 80 Highland Ave Ck#8438934
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8438933
PG&E 298 Bernal Rd Ck#8438938
PG&E 2700 Carol Ck#8438940
PG&E 1989 McKee Ck#8438936
PG&E 19050 Malaguerra Ave Ck#8438937
PG&E 190 Leavesley Rd #1 Ck#8438941
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8438942
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8438939
PG&E 1650 Los Plumas #A Ck#8438943
PG&E 1110 L Avenida Ave Ck#8438935
City of Palo Alto - lnv.Ref.#108 Ck#640762
PG&E - 245 Park Avenue Ck#8460040
PG&E Ck#8460038
PG&E Ck#8460039
PG&E Ck#8460037
PG&E Ck#8460036
PG&E - 614 Tully Rd Ck#8470130
PG&E - 450 Montague Expwy. Ck# 8470131
PG&E - Metcalf Rd. Ck#8484948
PG&E - 614 Tully Rd Ck#8484947
City of Santa Clara Rebate Ck274821 10/01
PG&E Ck#8524475
PG&E Ck#8534351
PG&E Ck#8534352
PG&E Ck#8534353
Energy Rebate GSA Ck#647345
Energy Rebate GSA Ck#647548
$13,950.00
$3,420.00
$2,280.00
$1,500.00
$6,000.00
$510.00
$252.00
$1,353.00
$874.50
9771
2515
07/24/01
1448
9771
2515
07/24/01
1448
9771
2515
07/24/01
1448
9771
2515
07/24/01
1451
9771
2515
08/10/01
2714
4105
9771
2515
08/29/01
9771
2515
08/29/01
4104
9771
2515
08/29/01
4105
9771
2515
08/29/01
4105
$72.00
$478.50
9771
2515
08/29/01
4104
9771
2515
08/29/01
4103
$3,915.00
9771
2515
08/29/01
4104
9771
2515
08/29/01
4104
9771
2515
08/29/01
4104
9771
2515
08/29/01
4105
9771
2515
08/29/01
4104
4105
4105
$97.88
$48.00
$742.50
$24.00
$1,183.87
9771
2515
08/29/01
$457.88
$24.00
$144.00
$156.00
$96.00
9771
2515
08/29/01
9771
2515
09/05/01
4472
9771
2515
09/05/01
4473
9771
2515
09/05/01
4472
9771
2515
09/06/01
4560
$1,890.00
$1,138.50
$1,386.00
9771
2515
09/06/01
4559
9771
2515
09/06/01
4560
9771
2515
09/06/01
4559
4559
$82.50
9771
2515
09/06/01
$2,277.00
9771
2515
09/06/01
4560
$825.00
$600.00
9771
2515
09/06/01
4559
9771
2515
09/06/01
4560
$5,062.50
$1,237.50
$210.00
$2,280.00
9771
2515
09/06/01
4559
9771
2515
09/06/01
4560
9771
2515
09/06/01
4559
9771
2515
09/06/01
4560
$140.00
9771
2515
09/17/01
5266
$2,550.00
$4,890.00
$11,340.00
$2,970.00
$2,880.00
$3,069.00
$3,600.00
9771
2515
09/20/01
5527
9771
2515
09/20/01
5527
9771
2515
09/20/01
5527
5527
$72.00
$1,023.00
$2,130.00
$1,410.00
$2,100.00
9771
2515
09/20/01
9771
2515
09/20/01
5527
9771
2515
10/01/01
6272
9771
2515
10/01/01
6272
9771
2515
10/12/01
7137
9771
2515
10/12/01
7137
9771
2515
10/12/01
7137
9771
2515
11/07/01
8950
9771
2515
11/14/01
9346
$1,530.00
$360.00
9771
2515
11/14/01
9346
9771
2515
11/14/01
9346
$200.00
9771
2515
12/18/01
1743
$1,390.00
9771
2515
12/21/01
2053
Energy Rebate GSA Ck#278779
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612859
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612858
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612857
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612856
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612855
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612854
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612853
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612852
PG&E Ck#8632766
PG&E Ck#8632767
PG&E Ck#8632768
PG&E Ck#8632769
PG&E Ck#8632770
PG&E Ck#8632771
PG&E 150 LEAVESLEY RD CK#9252752
PG&E 1215 1ST ST CK#9252754
PG&E 190 LEAVSLEY RD CK#9252753
PG&E LANDING METCALF PROJ CK#9245663
Total Rebates FY01 to FY03
$135.00
9771
2515
12/28/01
2462
$1,230.00
9771
2515
01/15/02
3566
$360.00
9771
2515
01/15/02
3566
$1,530.00
$1,683.00
$742.50
$1,435.50
$900.00
$570.00
$165.00
$709.50
$346.50
$313.50
9771
2515
01/15/02
3566
9771
2515
01/15/02
3567
9771
2515
01/15/02
3567
9771
2515
01/15/02
3567
9771
2515
01/15/02
3567
9771
2515
01/15/02
3567
9771
2515
02/04/02
4913
9771
2515
02/04/02
4913
9771
2515
02/04/02
4913
9771
2515
02/04/02
4913
$189.75
$561.00
$360.00
9771
2515
02/04/02
4914
9771
2515
02/04/02
4914
9771
2515
04/17/03
020131
$1,217.00
$1,837.50
$923.50
9771
2515
04/17/03
020131
9771
2515
04/17/03
020131
9771
2515
04/17/03
020131
$262,948.13
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
09/21/2004
1
Expense Report: ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
LABOR
WoNum
Status
Description
Bldg Nm
Regular
MATERIAL
$74,760
SERVICE
TOTAL
VENDOR
COST
$17,292
$575,954
S17;4S2.
: : $151,775
$450,000
$4,337
$479,564
$483,901
ALCOHOL :
$60,000
;:$173
:$I?7,886
$128,060
$6,263:
SSA CHILD
$40,000
$925
$14,650
$15,576
$25,000
REPLACE WRIGHT RANCH PUMP SANTA TERESA
$40,000 ;
$128
:$85;
$214
CLOSE
Energy Curtailment Projects - Various COUNTY SERVICE
$85,000
$38,812
$34,148
$72,961
CLOSE
Add Diverter Valve to boilers - East
$772
$686
$1,458
$5,500
$6,958
$1,373
$3,561
$19,591
$23,152
:S942
$2,487
$1,209
$3,696
$4,967
$7,075
$1,630
$8,705
$686
$686
$85
$2,660
460224
CLOSE
ROOFING PROJ ECTS - Elmwood
ELMWD REHAB
460226
CLOSE
RE-ROOF- MARIPOSA LODGE
460231
CLOSE
REPLACE ROOF-SSA
465831
CANCL
485091
496975
496978
Overtime
Est Cost
TOTAL LABOR
CLOSE
CCOB-EAST WING
: :
Install New Boiler Controls - Building COUNTY SERVICE
, $7,000; ;
$20,000
$2,188
$214
$15,953
$88,914
496981
CLOSE
Set or Install time
ALCOHOL::; ;; ;;
i; $2,500 j
496982
CLOSE
Set or Install time
ELMWD REHAB
$5,000
496983
CLOSE
Setor InHalLume : i v:
ELMWD REHAB
496984
CLOSE
Set or Install lime
PROBATION-MURIE
,496985
CLOSE
Set 9r Install time
JAMES
496986
CLOSE
Set or Install time
HOLDEN
496987:
CLOSE
Set or Install time
JUVENILE;; :
$5,000
$514
$L845:
$2,360
496988
CLOSE
Set or Install time
PROBATION-WORK
$1,500
$1,351
$214
$1,566
$1,566
496989
CLOSE :; ;Adjust Ecbnpmizersfor Maximum
SANTA
Si,000
$L<»58
$1,058
$1,058;
496990
CLOSE
Replace vanity lights with fluorescents SUNNYVALE
$391
$391
496991
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for;Maxiraurn
:Si:p2;
$102
496993
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
496994
: CLOSE
496995
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
496996
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers:for Maximum
496997
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
HOLDEN
496999
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
PROBATION-MURIE
497000
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
NORTH COUNTY
497001
CLOSE : : Adjust Economizers:for MaxiUium
497002
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
GSA
$5,000
497003:: :
CLOSE
Adjust Econpmizersfpr Maximum
parkalameda
$5,000 :
497004
CLOSE
Adjust Econpmizers for Maximum
FAIR OAKS MENTAL
$250
497005
close / Adjust Ecpnomizers for Maximum
ChabpyaVHC
$700
497011
CLOSE
497013
CLOSE . : Adjust Ecpnpmizers for Maximum
:jSQUTH GOUI4TY ;
SOUTH COUNTY
:
: :$L?44,
$40,576
$2,107
$600
$5,000
$300
$2,574
$257,
$100 ;
$5,000
AcyustEconoimzerslor Maximum; :Sipu;iTlCOUNTY ;;T
Adjust Ecpnpmizers for Maximum
SOUTH COUNTY
; JM^ES
$643
$600
VASONA
,53-921
$4,361
:
$1,000
:i$948
$4,995
$7,655
$257
$257
$0
$0
$L640
$630
$4,000
$1,022
$102
:
$0
$0
SO
; ; SO
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$643
$643
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8,283 : .
$61,548:
$69,832
$214
$214
$214
$686
$686
$686
$0
$0
SOUTH COUNTY
PROBATION-WORK
$686
$600
$1,549
:
$34
$1,583:
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
Expense Report: ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
09/21/2004
2
LABOR
Status
WoNum
Description
Bldg Nm
Regular
Overtime
Est Cost
497014
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
ELMWD REHAB
$3,000
497015
:; CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
ELMWD REHAB
$600
497016
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
NORTH COUNTY
$200
497035
CLOSE
Install Motion Sensors in Conference CCOB^EAST WING
$20,000
497036
CLOSE
Install Low Voltage Switches by
CCOB-EAST WING
$17,500
497037
CLOSE
Install Low Voltage Switches by
: CCOB-EAST WING
$5,000
TOTAL LABOR
MATERIAL
SERVICE
TOTAL
VENDOR
COST
$1,201
$3,527
$3,527
$686
$686
; $686
$171
$171
$171
$2,310
$21,537
$23,847
$1,472
$15,286
$16,758
$5,951
$2,325
;
:
$7,514
$31,362
$177
$3,141
$20,076
$8,048
:$1;5
$8,063
$2,392
$91,706
$152,220
497038
CLOSE
Install Motion Sensors in Conference COUNTY SERVICE
$45,000
$7,649
$50,472
$58,122
497039
CLOSE
Install Mouon Sensors in Conference: HALL OF
$45,000
$3,748
: $36,620:
$40,368
: ;:$11,661
>$52,030
497040
CLOSE
Install Motion Sensors in Conference SHERIFF
$15,000
$14,006
$14,006
$6,493
$20,500
: :::: :$673
$1,379
$2,291
$3,670
$6,473
$7,649
$6,325
$13,975
$230
$308
497041
. Replace all Incendescent Type Exit
CCOBrEAST WING
:$L500
$7,000
497042
CLOSE
Replace all Incendescent Type Exit
CCOB-WEST WING
497043
; ::CLOSE
Replace allincendescent Type Exit
HALL OF
497044
CLOSE
Replace all Incendescent Type Exit
JUVENILE
497045
CLOSE
Replace all Incendescent Type Exit
SHERIFF
497046
CLOSE
Replace all Incendescent Type Exit
COUNTY SERVICE
497047
CLOSE
Replace allliicendescent Type Exit
COUNTY SERVICE
497049
CLOSE
Replace all Incendescent Type Exit
COUNTY SERVICE
497050
;CLOSE
497051
CLOSE
497053
: CLOSE
497054
CLOSE
Install Task Lighting Motion Sensor
CLOSE
InstallTasklightingMotion Sensbr : SHERIFF
497056
CLOSE
Install Task Ughting Motion Sensor
497057
-CLOSE
497058
CLOSE
Install Task Lighting Motion Sensor
497732
CLOSE
498238
497055
:
;
$1,175
$78
$500
$4,460
$5i000
Install Task Lighting Motion Sensor: : CGOB-E/VST WING :
Install Task Lighting Motion Sensor
$705: : 1
$18,000:,^
S634
$4,137
$12,000
CCOB-WEST WING
Install Task Lighting Motion S^sot > :HALL OF :
: : $500
JUVENE-E
$5,000
$643
:
$2,000
Install Task Lighting Motion Sensor; COUNTY SERVICE
$4,460
$0
$0
$15,274
$7,774
$1,431:
$1,431
$1,896
$1,896
$3,712:
Replace intetibr light with Energy:
JUVENILE
$2,000: -
CLOSE
Install Energy Saving Components -
MAIN JAIL NORTH -
498518
CLOSE
Contract to Support EnergyProjects ;- COUNTY SERVICE
500625
CLOSE
Install Motion Sensors and Locking
MEDICAL
$3,000
500920
CLOSE
Install Tiiher for Exterlor Lights -;
DOWNTOWN
$1,000
501217
CLOSE
Install Elevator Signs in support of the CCOB-EAST WING
501281
, : / CLOSE
$405
$405
$7,131
$24,073
$500
$1,158
$2,915
$11,580
$3,805
$1,431
$2,092
$196
$3,712.
$24,516
:$E489:
$128
:
$4,460
$3,000
$443
$1,800
$0
$12,274
$5,000
>
$0
$8,136
COUNTY SERVICE
CCOBrEAST WING
$0
$133,103
$2,850
Install Tint on Elevator Windows
$0
$114,245;
$862
$5,000
$0
$18,857
$4,000, : ;:
$10,000
$0
:$18i2p:: :; :
:$405 : :
$i:.500
COUNTY SERVICE
: ::
$78::
$912
$25,429
$4,969
$6i459
$26,307
$26,435
$3,111
$29,547
$304
$304
$1,230
$1,534
$1,673
$2,832
$261
$3,093
$1,029 :
$1,029
$62
$1,092
$1,445
$4,360
$;i>278
$1,278
$4,360
$1,778
$500 :::: ::: ;;
I
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
Expense Report: ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
09/21/2004
3
LABOR
WoNum
501314
504047
Status
CLOSE
CLOSE
Description
Perform Meter Expansion Survey -
Overtime
Est Cost
Bldg Nm
$20,000
Install Motion Sensors and Attic Fans CHILD SHELTER
; : $6,587
$13^879:
$9,046
$15,953
$10,000
SOCIAL SERVICES
$2,675
$128
$10,000
COUNTY SERVICE
Regular
COST
$2,804
$8,350
$11,154
$20,467;
$9,600
$1,342
$31,410
$24,999
$50,792
$45,684
$121,475
CLOSE
Install Task Lighting - SSA -
505096
CLOSE
Review Feasibility Studies for Energy COUNTY SERVICE
505171
CLOSE
install motion sensor lights in the three GSA
507082
: CLOSE
507084
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSOR WALL EAST VALLEY
$3,000
$6,965
$6,965
507085
CLOSE
INSTALLMOTION SENSOR WALL EAST VHC(PH)
$6,500
$6,830; ; ;
$6,830
507087
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSOR WALL **DEMOLISHED**V
507088
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSOR WALL FAIR OAKS IvlENTAL
507768
CLOSE
Cut down on Interior Lighting -
COUNTY SERVICE
507771
CLOSE
Cut down on Interior Lighting -■
ELMWD REHAB
507824
CLOSE
REDUCE LIGHTING IN BUTLER
VMC-HEALTH
507825
OLOSE
CUT BACKLIGHTING IN FOOD
ELMWD REHAB
507827
CLOSE
MINIMIZE LIGHTING IN
COUNTY SERVICE
508406
CLOSE
Provide a sdtvey to deteriniheivyays to STARLIGHT
508518
CLOSE
INVENTORY SETBACK
TRAFFIC COURT
508568
CLOSE
Replace old thennostat with hew
SOCIAL;
$200
508599
CLOSE
REPLACE T - 12 LAMPS WITH T -
ALCOHOL
$800
508926
CLOSE
Support; Andpyer EnergyUpgrades
CCOB^EAST WING
509219
CLOSE
PROVIDE / INSTALL
DOWNTOWN
509247:
: CLOSE
Change aU m&ury thermostats to
VASONA
509513
CLOSE
Install Emergency Generator to
SUNNYVALE
510265
: CLOSE
Inventory T-stats - Parks
TOTAL
VENDOR
MATERIAL
504395
INSTALL MOTION SENSOR WALL ; FAIR:0AKS;VHG:
SERVICE
TOTAL LABOR
$0
$0
$128
$500
^
:ALMADEN
$700
:
$386
$18,000
$386
$514
$660 ; :
$660
$19,011
$574
$59
$2,608:
$3,269
$654
$7,620
$6,830
$377
$19,397
$19,774
$2,758
$2,758
$5,000
$0
$0
$5,000
$0 : :
$3,000
$2/7587
vV
:
$200
$171;: :
$2,128
$2,000
$5,000
;$85
:;
$0
$171
$171
$2,128
$2,128
$Q
$0
$0
$0
$85; : L
$11,359
$19,223
$27,848
$257
$257
S813:
$815
$70,000
$772
$772
$1,000
$772
$772
$8,624
$5,000
: $1,000
510698
CANCL
INSTALL override for BLDG.
CCOB-EAST WING
510699
CANCL
INSTALL OVERRIDE FOR
GOUNTYSERVICE; : ™
510701
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS. SEE Chaboya VHC
$5,000
510704
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS- SEE : PROB ATION-MURIE
$5,000
510707
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS - SEE JAMES
$5,000
510708
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS ^ SEE HOLDEN
$7,500
511000
CANCL
INSTALL OVERRIDES FOR HVAC COUNTY SERVICE
$1,500
511003
CANCL
INSTALL OVERRIDES FOR HVAC COUNTY SER VICE
:
$50,000
: :;
:
;
: . : : ;$196
$514
$8,115
$0
$11,359
$50,000
$8,115:
$100
$185
$393
$11,753
$39,154
$11,306
$257
$243
$1,058
$772
:
$395
$1,167
$0
$0
$0;;
$0
$239
$13,018
$12,778
$12,778
$6,642
$6,642
$4,261
$4,261
$7,809
$8,005
$8,005
$1,201
$1,201
$686
:$o::'
$6,642
$54
$4,316
■
;$o:
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
Expense Report: ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
09/21/2004
4
LABOR
Status
WoNum
Description
Bldg Nm
Overtime
Est Cost
TOTAL LABOR
Regular
MATERIAL
SERVICE
TOTAL
VENDOR
COST
$335
$335
$335
512004
CLOSE
investigate and correct parking lot
Superior Court Admin
$5,000
512005
CANCL
INVESTIGATE AND CORRECT
DOWNTOWN
$5,000: : :
$0
512006
CANCL
INVESTIGATE AND CORRECT
OLD COURT HOUSE
$1,000
$0
512161
CLOSE
INVESTIGATE EMS SYSTEM TO
512163
CLOSE
SET THE SOUTH COUNTY
JAMES
$1,500
$1,373
$1,373
$1,373
512165
CLOSE
SET BARBER COLMAN EMS
MAIN JAIL NORTH-
$1,000
$858
$858
$858
CANCL
WALK THRU WITH MELANIE TO
DOWNTOWN
$5,000
$0
$0
512756
513043
CLOSE
RECONFIGURE A/C CONTROLS;; ;; ELMW3 RfflAB
513152
CLOSE
INSTALL WALL MOTION
513213
CLOSE
REPAIRmEPLACEROOF ATEA^: EAST VHGXPH)
CLOSE
513218
REPAIR/REPLACE ROOF AT
San Martin VHC(din
REPAIR/REPLAGE ROOF AT
PROBATION-MURIE
513220
CLOSE
REPAIR/REPLACE ROOF AT
MEDICAL
513221
CLOSE
REPAIR/REPLACE ROOF AATHOJ HALL OF
513231
CLOSE
ENERGY SAVINGS PROJECTS
Service Center Compl
513445
CLOSE
Install 2 pole time clock;to control
JUVENILE
513874
CLOSE
Install(4)Programmable Thermostats GSA FLEET
513875
; CLOSE
Install TLCUghtingControlS:-:::;
516567
CLOSE
516568
:
$450
$2,660
$5,000
$643
$410
: : $1,054
$12,043
$12,043
$277
$12,321
$2,208
$2/208
::
$67,658 \
;
: $70,743
$114
$49,901
$248
$15,386:
.
$2,950
; $117/118
$62,848
$52,150; :
$386
$2,600
:
$125,844
$0
$0
$5,000
$16,158
$102,966
$54,456
$8,392
$8,392
, . $3,084
V
$101,484
$101,484- : ;
$80,000 :
$13,950 :
$52,951
$52,951
$108,000
; ;$3,326:
$215
$3,110
:
$643
: $5,000:
SOUTH COUNTY
CLOSE
513219
$5,000
ALAMEDA
$0
$985; :
$2,986
$915
$486
$1,000
$429
$429
DOWNl'OWN
;$200
$14,782
$14,782
SOUTH COUNTY
$5,000
$0
$0
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
ADJUST THERM0STATS:F0R
SOUTH COUNTY
$5,000; .
$0
$0
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
TEMPORARY
$5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
516573
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
$5,000
$0
516574
LOS GATOS
: : $0:
adjust THERMOSTATS FOR
SANTA
$5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
516576
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
SUNNYVALE
$5;000 :
:: :$574
CLOSE
; $574
516577
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
TRAFHC COURT
$5,000
$214
CLOSE
$214
516579
516581
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
FAMILYCOURT
$5,000
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
SSA/FAMILY
$5,000
$171
516582
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
Superior Court Admin
$5,000
: $85: -
516584
516587
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
Superior Court - Pro
$5,000
516589
CLOSL
MISCELLANEOUS OTHER(DO
CRIMINAL COURTS
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
DOWNTOWN
$5,000
$85
$85
516590
OLDCOURT HOUSE
$5,000:
$514
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
$514
516591
:
$5,000 :
:$574/ $214
$77 :
$4,598
$285:;: ;
; $77
$77.
$171
$171
$85;^
$85
$0
$0
■ - ■ $422'::"
:'''--'$422 "
: $19,666
$495
$72;.
$85
$573:
;$58::
I
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
09/21/2004
Expense Report; ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
S
LABOR
WoNum
Status
Description
Overtime
Est Cost
Bldg Nm
516593
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
HALL OF
$5,000
517188
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS
GSA
$5,000.
517220
CLOSE
RAISE TEMPERATURE IN AREAS HALL OF
517421
CANCL
ESTIMATE TO BREAK DOWN THE MAIN JAIL SOUTH -
521136
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS TO
SSA
521138
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS TO
SSA - CALWORKS
521142
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS TO
521145
CLOSE
521146
CLOSE
521147
CLOSE
Regular
$317
TOTAL LABOR
MATERIAL
SERVICE
TOTAL
VENDOR
COST
$317
$317
$0
$0
$700
$1,158
$1,158
$1,158
$12,415
: ::$I,038^
$1,038
$1,038
$1,209
$1,209
$1,209
$5,000
V $5,610
$5,610
CIVIC CENTER
$5,000
$711
$711
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS TO
PROEfATION-WORK;
$5,000
:$3,281::;:: v
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS TO
SSA CHILD
$5,000
$1,058
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS TO
MEDICAL y
$5,764
$153
$711
$3,308
$27
- $3,281
$1,058
$1,058
: $5;ooo : :;
$2,609
$2,609
$2,609
$5,000
$2,646
$2,646
$2,646
$12,939
$12,939
$1,185
$1,185
$3,847
$3,847
$257
$257
$257
523543
CLOSE
PUT CONTROLS ON HR DEPT.
CCOB-EAST WING
523545
CLOSE
DIM STAIRWELL UGHTS. ;
NORTH COUNTY
523677
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS FOR NORTH COUNTY
524306
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
JUVENILE
524307
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
HALL OF
$5,000
524309
CLOSE^^ ^
GSAGARAGE
$5,000
$1,158
$1,158
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
ROADS &
$5,000
$0
$0
524310
524311
CLOSE
PUT TTMERSCR MO™N
FAIR OAKS'mental
$5,000
'$360
$360
$360 I
$5,000
$302
$302
$302
524312
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
524313:
CLOSE ;;; PUT TIMERS OR MOTION ;
524314
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
n
MEDICAL
:
$5,000 ::
$5,000
: :CRIMINAL COURTS : ; ; ; ; $5,000
GSA
$5,000
$351
V
$13,129
$190 ;
$1,185
$10,435
$6,588
$2,317
$2,317;
$2,317;
$2,278
$2,630
$2,630
$1,115;:
$1,115
$1,1:15;
:eGOB-WESTAVING:
:$5i000
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
CCOB-EAST WING
$5,000
$858
$858
$858
CLOSE ; PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
COUNTY SERVICE
$5,000
$714;
$714
:/'$714
524319
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
COUNTY SERVICE
$5,000
$257
$257
$257
524320
524321
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
COUNTY SERVICE
$5,000
$909
$909
$909
install timers or sensors on lights
DOWNTOWN
S5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
524322
524323
CLOSE
PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
LOS G.ATOS
$609
$609
$609
CLOSE
PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
OLD COURT HOUSE
$386
$386
$386
524325
CLOSE
PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
: $5,000
$600
$600
$600
524326 :
CANCL
PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
SHERIFF
$5,000
$257
$257
$257
524328
CLOSE
PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
SOUTH COUNTY
$756
$756:
524329
524315
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION ;
524317
CLOSE
; DOWNTOWN
; ;?S,000 .;
;
$756
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
Expense Report; ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
09/21/2004
6
LABOR
WoNum
Status
Description
San Martin VHC(Adul
524331
CLOSE
524332/: Z ;:
CLOSE : ,: PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
SAN MARTIN VHC
524334
CLOSE
SOUTH COUNTY
524339
PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
Bldg Nm
PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
: : vCLOSE : : PUT TIMERS OR MOTION :
i ; HALL OF
Overtime
Est Cost
Regular
TOTAL LABOR
$5,000
; $604
$5,000
$5,000
$85
;
n ;
MATERIAL
SERVICE
TOTAL
VENDOR
COST
$0
$0
$604
$604
$0
$0
^
$85
$85:
$5,000
$1,476
$1,476
$1,476
NORTH COUNTY
: : : :$5,000:
$128
$128
$128
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
NORTH COUNTY
$5,000
$3,733
$3,733
$3,733
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
MAIN JAIL SOUTH -
$5,000
$429
$429
:,$429':
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
MAIN JAIL NORTH-
$5
$128
$128
$128
524352
524586
CLOSE
INSTALL TIMERS OR MOT10N
WST VALLEY
$5,000
$1,925
$1,925
$1,925
CLOSE
REPLACE 9 INCANDESCENT EXIT MEDICAL
$5,000
$507
$507
$507
525103
526043
CLOSED ^ : P^^^^ energy RELATED
524345
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
SANTA
524346:
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
524349
CLOSE
524351
SUNNYVALE
$i:28
:$5i00o
$2,212:
526044
CLOSE
PROVIDE ENERGY RELATED
STARLIGHT
$5,000
$11,208
$11,208
526046
CTOSE
PROVIDE ENERGY RELATED
TRAFFIC COURT
$5,000
$738
$738
$2,020
$2,341
$2,341
$2,020
$555
$11,763
$1,236
$3,257
$738 I
526047
CLOSE
PROVIDE ENERGY RELATED
ALMADEN
$5,000
526049
CANCL
PROVIDE ENERGY RELATED
SSA CHILD
:$5;000:
$0
PROVIDE ENERGY RELATED
SERVER CREEK
$5,000
$0
CANCL
$0
526050
CANCL
PROVIDE ENERGY RELATED
$5:,P00:
$0
526052:
SANTA
$0
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
DOWNTOWN
$1,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
528501
REiSET THERMOSTATS
Chaboya VHC
sliooo
$120
CLOSE
$120
528502^
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
PARK ALAMEDA
$1,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
528503
CIOSE
re-SET THERMOSTATS
TRAFFIC COURT
:$l:,p00;
$:1:,467
$1,467
$1,467
528508:
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
PROBATION-MURIE
$1,000
$257
$257
CLOSE
$257
528510
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
alcohol
:$i:,ooo
$85
$85
528516
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
ALMADEN
$1,000
$171
$171
528521
CLOSE
RE-SETTHERMOSTATS
NORTH COUNTY
:$1.000
$171:-:
$171
528525
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
PROBATION-WORK
$1,000
$171
$171
CLOSE
$171
528528
$0
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTAl S Closeftas; SUNNYVALE:
: : : $0
528536;
$1,000
$0
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS. Closed as FAIR OAKS MENTAL
$0
528542
$1,000
$171
$171
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS. Closed as SANTA
$171
528543
RE-SETTHERMOSTATS.
LOS GATOS
$1,000
$171
$171
CLOSE
$171
528545
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS.
SOUTH COUNTY
$1,000
$42
$42
: 528546
: :: : $1,000; :
$120
/
$0
: :$85:
$171
$42;;:
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
Expense Report: ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
09/21/2004
7
LABOR
WoNum
Status
Description
Overtime
Est Cost
Bldg Nm
Regular
TOTAL LABOR
MATERIAL
SERVICE
TOTAL
VENDOR
COST
$171
$171
528547
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
SOUTH COUNTY
$1,000
$171
CLOSE
RE-SETTHERMOSTATS
SOUTHCOUNTY
$1,000
. $42 :
$42
$42:
528548
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
SOUTH COUNTY
$1,000
$42
$42
$42
528549
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
SOUTH COUNTY
$1,000
$42
$42
$42
528550
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS. Closed as VASONA
$1,000
$171
$171
$171
528551
CLOSE
RE-SET thermostats.
$1,000
$171;: n
$171
$171
528552
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
JUVENILE
$0
$0
528578
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS.
EUvIWD REHAB
;$497
$497
528579
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
ELMWD REHAB
$514
528581
528582
CLOSE
R&SETTHERMOSTA^,
HOLDEN
532259
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
532261
CLOSE
532263
: JAMES
:
$1,000
:
:$497T :
$1,000
$1,000
$514
$514
: $1,000^
$171
$171
MAIN JAIL SOUTH -
$5,000
$13,335
$13,335
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
METHADONE
$5,000;:
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
**DEMOLISHED**V
$5,000
$0
532265
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
EAST VALLEY
S5,000
$0
532266
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
EAST VHC(MH)
$5,000
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
GSA GARAGE GAS
$5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0:.; ,.
532287
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
GSA FLEET
$5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
532288
532289
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
CIVIC CENTER
$5,000
$1,287
$1,287
532291
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
J^^^^
$5,000
$4,764
$4,764
532292
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
ROADS
$5,000
$1,373
$1,373
532293
532294
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
COUNTY SERVICE
$5,000
532295
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
COUNTY SERVICE
$5,000
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
COUNTY SERVICE
$5,000
$429 ; :
532296
SOUTH COUNTY
$5,000
$446
$446
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
$446
534355
SOUTH COUNTY
$5,000
$703 ! ;
$703!
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR v
$703
534357:
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
LOS GATOS
$5,000
$909
$909
CLOSE
$909
534359
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
SANTA;
$5,000
:: $1,458
$1,458
534360
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
FAIR OAKS VHC
$5,000
$257
$257
CLOSE
$257
534362
CLOSE
LN'STALl.I>RF-WIRING FOR
FAIR OAKS MENTAL
$5,000!
$257
$257
;: $257
534364;
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
SUNNYVALE
$5,000
$411
$411
CLOSE
$411
534365
334368 : : :
CLOSE! . INSTALL PRE-WIRING!F0R!
PARK ALAMEDA
$5,000
$411
$411
$429
$446
$738;
$1,287
:
$13,335
;
$429;
$738
$429;
$0
:: :::$0
;
$446
$446
; n $0
: GSA-FLEET;;!: n '
: $171;!:
;;
$0
..
$1,287
$5,003
$239:
$1,373
:
$1,025:
: $287
$1,287
$1,287
: $429
$2,250
::
$2,679
$1,458;
nn $411:
8
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
Expense Report: ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
09/21/2004
LABOR
WoNum
Status
Description
Bldg Nm
Overtime
Est Cost
COST
$703
$703
$703
$5,000
$1,047
$1,047
$1,047
OLD COURT HOUSE
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
DOWNTOWN
534373
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR:
Elmwood RehabiUtati:
:$5,000
534376
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
PROBATION-WORK
$5,000
534393:
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
HOLDEN
534394
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
JAMES
534372
TOTAL
VENDOR
$5,000:
INSTALL PRE-WIRINGTOR :
: CLOSE
SERVICE
$1,132
$5,000
534371
MATERIAL
$1,132
EASTVHC(PH)
CLOSE
TOTAL LABOR
$1,132
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
534370
Regular
; \$24,543: ; : /; :
$1,029
:$2A51
: :
$3,665
$5,000
'$2-519
$24,543
$27,063
$1,029
$1,029
$2,351,
$3,298
; : : $947
.
$3,665
$3,665
534396
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE^WIRING FOR
ALCOHOL
;$5i000:
$1,905
$1,905
$1,905
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
PROBATION-MURIE
$5,000
$411
$411
$411
534397
[534399
CLOSE
INSTIL pre-wiring FOR
CHILDSHELTER
$5,000
$3,896
$3,896
$3,896
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
GSA
$5,000
$377
$377
$377
534400
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
GSA
$5,000
$377:
$377:
$377
534401:
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
WOMENS
$5,000
$978
$978
CLOSE
$978
534402
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
MAIN JAIL NORTH -
$5,000
$291
$291
$291
534403
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
GSA-GARAGE GAS
$5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
534404
INSTALL PRE WIRING FOR
****VACANT*MENT
$5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
534405
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
SHOP
$5,000
$421
CLOSE
$421
534406
$5;000:
$0
CLOSE
INSTACL PRE-WIRlNG:;FOR i : ::: StWage Shed
$0
534408
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
Warehouse
$5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
534409
CLOSE: : mSTAEL PRE-WIRl^ FOR
NORTH COUNTY
$5i000
$1,939
$1,939
534410
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
NORTH COUNTY
$5,000
$514
$514
CLOSE
$514
534411
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
VECTOR CONTROL
$5,bOQ:
$171
$171
CLOSE
$171
534413:
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
WEST VALLEY
$5,000
$909
$909
CLOSE
$909
534414
TEMPORARY
:$5;000
$11218:
$1,218
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
$1,218
534415:
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
SOUTH COUNTY
$5,000
$669
$669
CLOSE
$669
534416
ESTIMATE TO UPGRADE
MAIN JAIL SOUTH-
:$5;ooo
$171 7::.
$171
CLOSE
:$l7i
535232:
537770
CANCL
Contract for electrical Power
COUNTY SERVICE
5394497: 7
: CLOSE
Tintiremaining epuris: windows;f6i:: :: HALL OF
$12,000
$421
$193
$5,000
$15,247
$6,894
$7,087
$1,973
;$34::
$11,600
$18,687
$29,765
:$5:3-
$53,
$29,712.
$108,260
$123,507
$1,020
$127,823
$3,296
540214
CLOSE
Purchase Power Meters for various
COUNTY SERVICE
$270,000
CLOSE
DETERMINEFF NEEDED AND
CCQB-EAST WING
$5iooo;
::$85
$85
$85
559622
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
WEST VALLEY
$5,000
$85
$85
CLOSE
$85
559628
CLOSE
DETERMLNE IF NEEDED AND~
IXIS GATOS
$5,000
:$257:
$257:
559629
$257
I
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
Expense Report: ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
09/21/2004
9
LABOR
Status
WoNum
Description
Bldg Nm
Overtime
Est Cost
Regular
TOTAL LABOR
MATERIAL
SERVICE
TOTAL
VENDOR
COST
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
CRIMINAL COURTS
$5,000
$532
$532
$532
559630
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
ROADS &
$5,000
$85
$85
$85
559632
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
FAIR OAKS MENTAL
$5,000
$197
$197
$197
559633
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
FAIR OAKS VHC ;
$5,000
$205
$205
$205
559634
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
NORTH COUNTY
$5,000
$514
$514
$514
559635
559636
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
J uvenile Probation:#
$5,000 .
$674
$674
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
MAIN JAIL SOUTH -
$5,000
$0
$0
559637
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
MADi JAIL NORTH -
$5,000
$0
$0
559638
560933
CLOSE
ESTIMATE COST TO UPGRADE
OFHCE FOR DEBS
$5,000
$619
$619
560935
CLOSE
ESTIMATE COST OF UPGRADING MENTAL HEALT H /
$5,000
;$775
$775
560937
CLOSE
ESTIMATE COST OF UPGRADING SSA/CAL WORKS
$5,000
$1,058
$1,058
561664
CLOSE
Lower t-stats and replace damaged
HALL OF
$5,000
:$1;244
$1,244
564910
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
SHERIFF
$5,000
$6,170
$6,170
564911
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
COUNTY SERyiCE ;
$5,000
$3D15
$3,115
:^
n:;:$674: : >
$438
$1,057
$775
$2,170
$3,228
$1,244
$3,000
$9,170
$3,862;
$6,977
$1,071
$1,414
564913
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
SOUTH COUNTY
$5,000
$343
$343
CLOSE
determine IF NEEDED AND
San Martin VHC(Adul
$5,000
;$188:::
$188
$188
564914
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
MEDIC4D
$5,000
$171
$171
CLOSE
$171
564915
CLOSE
INSTALL LOCKING THERMOSTAT ADMIN SSA
, $5,000
$4,149
$4,149
$4,149
INSTALL LOCKING THERMOSTAT DEPT OF FAMILY &
$5,000
$5,594
$5,594
CLOSE
$5,594
564920
CLOSE
PROVIDE PG&E REQUESTED
SSA/CALWORKS
$180,000
$;18v9q8
$18,908
$18*908
573859
PROVIDE PG&E REQUESTED
OFFICE FOR DEBS
$7,000
$3,608
$3,608
CLOSE
$3,608
573862
MAIN JAIL SOUTH
$6,000
;: ::$3*484;
$3,484
CLOSE ; Improve Lighting in Boiler Room -
$3,484
575492
CLOSE
Adjust Lighting in the Garage - Park
CIVIC CENTER
$5,000
$7,989
$7,989
575569
582163
CLOSE
SUPPORT RE-LAMPING
CCOB-EAST WING
582165
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS
PUBLIC DEFENDER
583713:
CLOSE
Siipport Electrical Power Monitoring COUNTY SERVICE
:: ::::::$15,000
586867
CLOSE
Relamp warehouse - Building One -
COUNTY SERVICE
$2,700
GROUPS 1 & 2 - ENERGY
COUNTY SERVICE ;
564919
:
600443
-CLOSE:
600444
CLOSE
PRISON TOILET SYSTEM -
COUNTY SERVICE
622980
CLOSE
SUB 600444 - M4 TOILETS-
COUNTYSERVICE
622982
CLOSE
SUB 01600444 - TOILETS M5 -
COUNTY SERVICE
$0
$472
; $463,658
$324,508
:$2,438:::
$666
$5,666
$30,011
$8 387 :
$2,438
$666
$30,011
i;
$86
$472
$3,034
$13,656
$441
$558
$10,825
$4,142
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTALS:
Selection Criteria:
Group By:
Start Date:
WorkType=F,PCA=ROENE
WoNum
Ol/OICOOO
End Date:
09/01/2004
$145,771
$1,667,742
$1,813,513
$351,974
$621,463
$2,786,951
POLICY RESOLUTION # 06-03
Of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Clara
Approving Modifications to the Board Policy Manual Relating to
Green Building Policy
WHEREAS, the County of Santa Clara supports sustainable economic
development by encouraging the expansion of jobs in the environmental services
and materials sector, which includes green building practices, products and
technologies; and
WHEREAS,the County of Santa Clara recognizes and accepts its responsibility
to implement and promote building practices that protect the Santa Clara natural
environment: and
WHEREAS, development and construction practices are significant contributors
to the depletion of natural resources and a contributing cause of water and air
pollution, solid waste, deforestation, toxic wastes, health hazards, global
warming, and other negative consequences; and
WHEREAS, buildings use one quarter of the entire world’s wood harvest,
consume two fifths of all materials and energy flows, and contribute to C02
emissions; and
WHEREAS,the United States Green Building Council has created Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)standards that identify a range of
actions defining green buildings and establishing certification processes for new
and existing buildings; and
WHEREAS,the County of Santa Clara recognizes that green building
complements many existing policies and initiatives related to energy
conservation and alternative energy production, waste reduction, waste
recycling, use of degradable plastic products, e-waste management, pest
management, and low emission vehicles use in the County Fleet;
WHEREAS, the proposed Green Building Policy contains strategies to 1)
evaluate LEED certification in all new construction of County owned buildings
where appropriate, 2) use green building goals and practices in renovations and
operations of existing facilities, 3) provide training and education for all
appropriate County procurement, capital projects and facility management staff
on green building practices and products, and 3) promote voluntary application of
green building guidelines in private sector building design, construction and
operations; and
WHEREAS,the County of Santa Clara has already pursued LEED certification
and applied green building principles in recent bond financed capital projects
including the Crime Laboratory, and Santa Clara Valley Health Clinics at Gilroy,
Milpitas, and Fair Oaks; and
WHEREAS,the County of Santa Clara finds that green design and construction
deoisions made during the construction and remodeling of County owned
buildings can result in significant cost savings to the County over the life of the
buildings; and
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Santa Clara that a Green Building policy be established and that the
Board of Supervisor’s Policy Manual is hereby amended adding Section 7.14 as
follows to establish this poiicy;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the Board is directed to
incorporate this additional language into the Manual so that it is available to all
County staff.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa
by the following vote:
Clara, State of California, on
AYES:
Supervisors
NOES:
Supervisors
ABSTAIN:
Supervisors
ABSENT:
Supervisors
James T. Beall Jr., Chair
Board of Supervisors
DATED:
ATTEST:
Phyllis Perez, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
DATED:
County Counsel
7.14. GREEN BUILDING POLICY
7.14.1 Introduction
“Green building” is the practice of constructing and maintaining buildings in a
manner that provides for efficient and sustainable usage of building materials;
provides for water and energy conservation; provides for a healthy work
environment; and reduces waste and pollution from building construction,
maintenance, and demolition.
The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program, as
developed by the United States Green Building Council, is the most extensive,
authoritative and well recognized standard that distinguishes “green buildings”
from other buildings. The LEED program makes this distinction by providing
common standards of measurement for designing, constructing, and maintaining
“green buildings.” Common measurement standards include usage of
sustainable, recyclable, and non-toxic building materials; standards for reduced
energy and water consumption; and construction practices that reduce
environmental impacts.
7.14.2 Policy Statement
It is the policy of the Board of Supervisors that “green building” standards, as
defined by the LEEDS program and other applicable government building codes,
be implemented for purposes of constructing and maintaining County owned
buildings in a manner that provides for efficient and sustainable usage of building
materials; provides for water and energy conservation; provides for healthy work
environments; and reduces waste and pollution from building construction,
maintenance, and demolition.
The County of Santa Clara recognizes that establishing this policy provides a
model for other jurisdictions, the private sector and County residents. As such it
is intended to establish practices, training programs and procedures that may be
of interest to individuals and organizations. Educational materials will be
available to the public through publicly accessible documentation on the County
website, and through the Planning Department.
7.14.3 Procedures
The following procedures will be used in designing, constructing, maintaining and
demolishing buildings in accordance with “green building” concepts;
(A) The LEED program and its guidelines will be the County’s primary “green
building” standard for designing, constructing, maintaining, and
demolishing buildings.
(B) The LEED program has four levels of “green building” performance
(Certified, Silver, Gold, and Platinum). During the design of each new
building. Capital Programs Division will provide a recommendation to the
Board of Supervisors regarding the appropriate level of LEED certification
and the resulting benefits and costs.
a.
b.
Certain new building types may not be appropriate for LEED
certification. In these situations Capital Programs will provide a
report explaining why LEED certification is not appropriate.
The County may also construct a building to LEED standards, but
forgo the administrative costs of pursuing formal LEED certification
recognition from the United States Green Building Council. Capital
Programs will provide information regarding the administrative
costs of pursuing formal LEED certification in its recommendation
to the Board of Supervisors.
(C) Based upon this information and recommendation, the Board of
Supervisors will provide direction regarding the level of LEED
performance to be achieved for each new County owned building, and
whether the LEED certification process will be pursued to obtain formal
LEED recognition from the United States Green Building Council.
(D) Where no LEED program certification standard exists, the intent of this
policy is that green building practices will be applied to the extent
practicable.
(E) In addition to LEED goals, an additional design goal will be established
for new facilities to exceed California Title 24 Building Code energy
consumption regulations.
(F) New County owned buildings will also be designed to control storm water
runoff in accordance with the requirements and procedures set forth in
the Santa Clara Valiev Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program.
(G) LEED “green building” concepts will be used in building renovations.
These concepts will include to the extent practicable, but not be limited
to, improving water and energy conservation; using non-toxic materials;
using sustainable and recyclable materials; and recycling demolition
materials.
(H) Equipment and products used within buildings will meet established
Board policies pertaining to waste reduction, waste recycling, degradable
plastic products, e-waste management, energy efficient equipment, pest
management, and other related policies.
(I) “Green building” expertise will be a criterion in selecting architectural and
engineering firms.
(J) An evaluation of renewable and/or other alternative energy sources will
be made during the design of new buildings.
(K) An energy analysis will be performed for the design of each new building,
and each energy analysis will receive a design peer review.
(L) To the extent that it is economical and practical, the construction design
for each new building will include installation of individual power meters
that are compatible with and can be incorporated into the Building
Operations Enterprise Energy Management System for energy data
collection, analysis and building energy management.
7.14.4 Education
The County will promote “green building” practices by:
(A)Providing educational brochures and information accessible via the
County website and at the Planning Department Development services
counter.
(B) Participating in and sponsoring educational events.
(C)Training capital project managers and selected facility management staff
on “green building” practices.
(D) Partnering with organizational groups that are promoting “green building’
practices.
Agenda Item No. 38
County of Santa Clara
Facilities And Fleet Department
Capital Programs
FAF02 100504
Prepared by: Lin Ortega
Interim Manager, GSA
Building Operations
DATE:
October 5, 2004
TO:
Board of Supervisors
FROM:
LaiTy Jinkins
Director of Facilities and Fleet Department
SUBJECT:
Report Back - County Energy Conservation Achievements
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Accept this informational report regarding the achievements of the County Energy
Conservation Program.
ETSCAE IMPLICATIONS
There is no impact to the General Fund as a result of accepting this report.
CONTRACT HTSTORY
Board of Supervisors: Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete McHugh,Jim Beall, Liz Kniss
Counf/ Executive; Peter Kutras Jr.
1
BOS Agendia Date;October 5,2004
Agenda Item No.38
Not applicable.
REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATTON
A referral was made at the August 3, 2004 Board of Supervisors meeting regarding the County's level of success in
reducing its electrical energy consumption. This report provides that information and additional supplemental
information.
BACKGROUND
In 2001, the State of California was faced with the worst energy crisis of recent history. On May 15, 2001, as a result of
the energy crisis, the Board of Supervisors formed the Emergency Energy Task Force(EETF)committee, co-chaired by
Supervisors Pete McHugh and Liz Kniss, to reduce the County's consumption of energy. The EETF committee directed
the former General Services Agency(GSA)to carry out a number of very important measures designed to conserve
energy usage in County facilities and to alleviate the need for rotating power outages. The EETF committee set an initial
energy conservation goal of 10%, which was subsequently raised to 20% because of the continued dismal power supply
projections by the State's energy providers. Successful implementation of these measures required the commitment and
leadership of each and every County agency and department director, as well as concerted action and some sacrifices by
every employee.
As a result of these extensive efforts, the County's consumption of electrical energy was 19.8 % lower in Fiscal Year
2004 then it was in Fiscal Year 2001. The Fiscal Year 2001 electrical consumption was 101,701,934 kWh. The Fiscal
Year 2004 consumption was 81,577,581 kWh.
Attachment 1 summarizes the energy consumption for the County's four major electrical accounts for Fiscal Years 2000
through 2004. The data and graphs show that the County was able to reduce its electrical energy consumption by 20.3 %
for these four major building complexes from FY 2000 to FY 2004.
Altogether, the County met its 20 % reduction goal.
GSA provided periodic progress reports to the EETF from the time the EETF was formed in 2001 until it was
discontinued in 2002. GSA continued providing reports to the Finance and Government Operations Committee(FGOC)
from 2002 until the present. The following is a summation of some of the information that was provided in those reports.
During the past three years the County has:
1. Completed over 500 individual energy conservation projects designed to reduce the County's gross power
consumption and to reduce peak power demand.
2. Installed real-time electrical power meters.
3. Initiated work on the facilities Enterprise Energy Management System.
4. Analyzed energy usage in County occupied facilities and implemented energy reduction measures.
Board of Supeivisors: Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete McHugh,Jim Beall, Liz Kniss
County Executive: Peter Kutras Jr.
2
BOS Agenda Date:October 5,2004
Agenda Item No. 38
5. Recommended County Purchasing Policies for purchasing energy efficient equipment.
6. Initiated the County's participation in PG&E's Energy Savings by Design program.
7. Analyzed and recommended alternatives for peak and gross energy demand reductions in the County.
8. Conducted energy audits of County facilities.
9. Studied the feasibility of using co-generation power plants.
10. Studied the feasibility of using alternative renewable power sources.
11. Implemented a County-wide Energy Savings Suggestion Program.
12. Subscribed to available rebate and incentive programs to help finance some of the County's energy conservation
efforts.
13. Created an Energy web site for suggestions and power supply status.
Projects and Energy Conservation Measures
Since 2001, the County has completed over 500 energy conservation projects at a cost of approximately $3.2 million
(see Attachment 2). Such projects have included;
a. Installation of 6,800 task lighting motion sensors;
b. Installation of 1,459 room lighting motion sensors;
c. Installation of new lighting controls systems in eight buildings;
d. Rewiring of lighting circuits to allow for uniform lighting;
e. Optimization of HVAC air intake economizers to take advantage of cool outside air thus reducing the need for
mechanically cooled air;
f Installation of 116 HVAC system time clocks and programmable thermostats;
g. Replacement of 139 incandescent exit signs with energy efficient LED (light emitting diode) exit signs;
h. Installation of reflective film on windows;
i. Installation of 23 cool roof systems;
j. Installation of boiler controls for more efficient gas usage on boiler systems;
k. Installation of attic fans;
Board of Supervisors: Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete McHugh,Jim Beall, Liz Kniss
Countjf Executive: Peter Kutras Jr.
3
BOS Agenda Date: October 5,2004
Agenda lten» No. 38
1. Installation of automatic tube brush cleaning systems for chillers;
m. Installation of 69 power meters;
n. Replacement of two water pumping stations; and
o. Retrofit of 716 lighting fixtures with energy efficient fluorescent lamps.
Installation of Real-Time Electrical Power Meters
On June 25, 2002, the Board of Supervisors approved the Power Meter Installation Project by awarding the contract to
Control Manufacturing Company(CMC). This project was approved as Phase One of a two-phase program, and was
done to measure consumption at specific buildings and to evaluate the quality and consistency of power being provided
by PG&E.Prior to the installation of these power meters, the County did not have a means to readily track energy
demand and could only rely upon data being provided by PG&E and other local utility providers. This project consisted
of installing 69 power meters, and was completed in December 2002. Attachment 3 provides a listing of sites where
power meters were installed.
Enterprise Energy Management System
Phase Two of the effort describe above is the installation of the Enterprise Energy Management System (EEMS). The
EEMS is the overall system that will give the County the ability to properly manage and control its electrical utilities,
and the potential to participate in load shedding energy rebate incentive programs. This system will enable the County to
control building power usage from the Building Operations MAC Room. The Board approved the funding for this
project at the August 3, 2004 Board Meeting. An RFP is being prepared.
Energy Usage in Countv Occupied Facilities
On June 8, 2001, the EETF requested GSA to establish and manage the County Energy Conservation Program, which
consists of managing energy conservation projects and work orders, and identifying other potential means to reduce the
County's energy consumption.
In addition to completing many energy conservation projects, GSA also analyzed building occupancy and employee
work schedules, and provided recommendations on possible alternatives that would lead to lower energy consumption in
some County buildings. GSA's analysis concluded with the recommendation to the EETF that the building utility
operating schedules be modified as opposed to other alternatives such as changing work schedules for employees or
closing buildings. This recommendation focused on operating building electrical systems at full capacity only during
actual working hours. This alternative proved to be the least disruptive to County workloads and mandated services
while being effective in terms of energy savings. For example - 2,473 kWh were saved per day by changing the 70 W
Hedding East Wing building systems operating hours from the former operating hours of 5 am to 2 am to new operating
hours of6 am to 9 pm.
Procurement Policies
GSA Procurement Department, with Board approval, developed and implemented new purchasing energy conservation
friendly policies. Such policy recommendations included the requirement that all electrical/electronic devices purchased
Board of Supervisors; Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete McHugh,Jim Beall, Liz Kniss
County Executive: Peter Kutras Jr.
4
BOS Agenda Date; October 5,2004
Agenda ttetn No.38
must be Energy Star rated.
Capital Programs Savings by Design
PG&E manages a "Savings by Design" program by which utility users may receive financial rebates by designing
buildings that achieve energy conservation goals that are greater than those required by California Title 24 standards.
The Capital Programs Division is participating in this program for each of the Bond funded programs. The Valley
Specialty Center is the first facility to receive recognition under the "Savings by Design" program. That facility has been
designed to achieve energy consumption that is 18 % lower than the Title 24 requirements. This will save the County an
estimated $254,000 in annual energy costs and makes the County eligible to receive a $150,000 PG&E rebate when the
project is completed.
Gross and Peak Load Reductions
GSA investigated and reported on various alternatives to reduce the County's peak and gross electrical consumption and
provided recommendations for each. Gross energy consumption reductions were identified as permanent reductions
which typically involved permanent alterations to the building systems. Peak energy consumption reductions involved
temporary changes designed to alleviate load demand during high consumption/low power supply periods (i.e., Stages 2
and 3). Some of the efforts undertaken to reduce gross energy demand were described earlier in this report. Another
important example would be the changing of temperature set-points in many buildings to 78 degrees for cooling and 68
degrees for heating for the peak period summer months and 70 degrees for heating and 76 degrees for cooling in the
peak winter months. Since 2002, the temperature set points where changed to remain at 70/76 throughout the year
instead of changing them seasonally.
Peak load reductions included alternatives such as reducing lighting levels where practical and operating emergency
power generators as a means of load shedding to alleviate the power grid during high demand/low power supply
conditions. This last alternative (use of emergency power generators) was discontinued upon learning of the air pollution
restrictions imposed by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District(BAAQMD). Because this was a very efficient
and direct way to reduce load, GSA investigated filter alternatives for its emergency generators so that these could be
operated when needed and still comply with the BAAQMD strict air quality guidelines. The generator filter alternative
proved to be too costly to implement.
Energy Audits
In efforts to compile a comprehensive list of energy conservation measures, the EETF recommended that GSA perform
comprehensive facility energy audits. GSA issued a REP to prospective bidders and eventually secured the services of
Chevron Energy Solutions(Chevron) at a cost of $355,316. Chevron performed energy audits on approximately 145
County owned buildings covering over 3.6 million square feet(see Attachment 4). Chevron's energy audits yielded a
number of Energy Conservation Measures(ECM)projects that were recommended for further evaluation. Examples of
such projects included lighting retrofits, EIVAC system modifications, installation of co-generation plants, and water
conservation measures. GSA evaluated the proposed projects against the financial criteria of available rebates, grants,
and payback periods. The County has completed five of these projects at a cost of $756,295 (see Attachment 5). One
project remains to be completed. This is the Berger 2 Chiller project approved by the Board on August 3, 2004 at a value
of $278,200. This last project will bring the total investment in Chevron recommended projects to $1,034,495.
Co-Generation Power Plants
Board of Supervisors: Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete McHugh,Jim Beall, Liz Kniss
County Executive: Peter Kutras Jr.
5
BOS Agenda Date; October 5,2004
Agenda Item No. 38
The consulting firm of Kuhn and Kuhn was hired to provide an analysis of the Chevron recommended project for
installation of co-generation plants at the Main Jail North and Elmwood facilities. Co-generation was recommended for
evaluation because the 24/7 operation of these two correctional facilities provided a constant load and had a higher
potential for producing positive savings as a result. Unfortunately, the Kuhn and Kuhn analysis showed these projects
were not economically viable projects and produced no immediate or mid-range savings. The project financing,
operating and maintenance costs were higher than the savings achieved.
Alternative Renewable Energy Resources
Being sensitive to the effects that power generation plants produce on the environment, and the potential for minimal
recurring investments to acquire power generation means, the EETF committee requested that GSA research alternative
renewable energy resources and study the possibility of installing such systems in County owned facilities. Reports on
the various alternative energy resources, such as solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, and fuel cells were generated by
Kuhn and Kuhn and were presented to the FGOC in 2002.
Countvwide Energy Savings Suggestion Program
In efforts to involve all County employees, the EETF Committee implemented the County-wide Energy Savings
Suggestion Program. This program proved very successful, particularly during the early to mid stages of the energy
conservation efforts. This program yielded in excess of 300 energy conservation suggestions during this time period.
Rebate Updates
According to PG&E records, the County had received over $1.7 million in rebates from 1990 to 1999. The magnitude of
these rebates show that the County was heavily involved in energy conservation projects prior to the 2001 energy crisis.
Since the 2001 energy crisis, the County has received a total of $391,758 in energy and water conservation related
rebates (see Attachment 6). These rebates have been generated as a result of subscriptions made by the County to the
different incentive programs offered by entities such as PG&E,California Energy Commission, and other program
sponsors such as the City of San Jose (for water conservation). Thus far in FY05, the County has received $36,108, and
is expecting an additional $50,000 before the end of the fiscal year. Including the anticipated rebate of $50,000, the
County's total for energy and water conservation related rebates will be $441,758 before the end of the current fiscal
year. The County will be receiving a $150,000 rebate under the PG&E Savings by Design program when the Valley
Specialty Center is completed in FY 07.
Current Energy Conservation Projects
The FAF Building Operations Division has programmed two energy conservation projects for FY05: 1) the HVAC
related project for Building 2 at Berger Drive, and 2)installation of the EEMS.
The HVAC project programmed for Berger 2 involves adding a small chiller to support the main computer room during
off hours. Currently this room is supported by a much larger chiller system that also supports other parts of the facility,
even when not needed. The installation of this smaller chiller will provide sufficient cooling for the computer room and
will operate at a much lower electrical cost. This measure is expected to generate about $29K in annual energy savings
and $50,000 in one-time energy rebates.
Board of Supervisors: Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete McHugh, Jim Beall, Liz Kniss
County Executive; Peter Kutras Jr.
6
BOS Agenda Date: October 5,2004
Agenda Item No. 38
The installation of the EEMS is phase two of the two-phase EEMS project described earlier in the report. The first phase
consisted of installing 69 additional real-time electrical power meters; this second phase involves installing the EEMS
system and linking all the power meters installed during phase one to existing computerized building control systems
(e.g., GE TLC Lighting controls, Andover, Johnson Controls, etc.) to provide true energy management capabilities. The
total project cost to implement this system will be $313,000; these are Fund 50 funds that have already been allocated
and approved by the Board of Supervisors.
FAF Capital Programs Division is continuing to pursue efforts under the PG&E Savings by Design program for the
Bond funded projects. The Crime Laboratory is currently being studied for means to exceed the energy conservation
goals of California Title 24 and eligibility for the PG&E Savings by Design program.
CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION
If this report is not accepted, the Board will not have the most recent information regarding the County's success in
reducing its electrical energy consumption.
STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors will forward one conformed copy of this transmittal to the Facilities and Fleet
Department, Intergovernmental Services Division, 2310 North First Street San Jose , CA.
ATTACHMENTS
•(Transmittal submitted on Sep 23, 2004 12:00:06 PM - PDF Version)
• Attachment 1 -Energy Savings Summary (Miscellaneous)
• Attachment 2 -Energy
Conservation Projects Matrix (Miscellaneous)
• Attachment 3 -Power Meter Installations (Miscellaneous)
• Attachment 4 -Chevron Audited Facilities (Miscellaneous)
• Attachment 5 -CES Energy
Conservation Measures (Miscellaneous)
• Attachment 6 -Rebates to Date (Miscellaneous)
Board of Supervisors: Donald F. Gage, Blanca Alvarado, Pete McHugh,Jim Beall, Liz Kniss
Counts' Executive: Peter Kutras Jr.
7
Attachment 1
Energy Savings Summary
(Savings reflected compare FYOO to rY04)
FY
FY’OO
FY’01
FY’02
FY’03
FY’04
180
171
55
Berger Dr.
Hedding
Hedding
Younger
Total
10,848,270
10,326,170
18,788,055
526,960
13,453,336
43,616,621
15,016,800
8,410,455
8,542,944
8,977,768
13,447,200
13,485,600
13,588,800
769,440
604,320
16,523,057
10,684,788
42,635,467
33,146,763
641,920
591,280
11,150,310
11,590,996
33,820,774
34,748,844
% Savings
Energy Reduction Comparison between FYOO and FY04:
Total
50,000,000 n
45,000,000 40,000,000 -
35,000,000 30,000,000 Total
25,000,000 20,000,000 -
15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0
FYOO
FYD1
FYD2
FYD3
FYD4
The data above includes the following buildings:
55
Berger Dr.
180 Hedding
171 Hedding
Younger
Sheriffs
Berger 1
Office
Main Jail North
Berger 2
Main Jail South
Berger 3
HOJ East &West
Roads &
Juvenile Hall
Airports
Complex
Parking
Garage
West Wing
East Wing
Fleet
Garage
Fleet Office
-20.33%
Attachment 6
(Rebates To Date)
Cost
Year/ Payment From
Center
Date
Log #
Amount
GL Acct
36,108.78
4723550
2516
8/13/04
002463
4723550
FY 05
CHEVRONTEXACO (Energy Rebate)
YTD Rebates FY05
$36,108.78
FY 04
2516
06/22/04
020289
4723550
2516
06/22/04
020289
4723550
2516
07/29/03
001579
4723550
2516
08/26/03
003195
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
$14,172.40
$50,000.00
$3,153.00
$3,153.00
$3,153.00
4723550
2516
10/16/03
006117
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
$153.00
4723550
2516
12/03/03
008698
4723550
2516
12/30/03
010140
4723550
2516
01/13/04
010866
4723550
2500
02/27/04
013439
4723550
2516
03/26/04
015146
2516
04/20/04
016521
4723550
2516
06/08/04
019479
$156.75
9771
2515
01/02/00
4913
$4,500.00
$1,080.00
$780.00
$2,310.00
$1,200.00
9771
2515
07/24/01
1450
9771
2515
07/24/01
1451
9771
2515
07/24/01
1450
9771
2515
07/24/01
1450
9771
2515
07/24/01
1449
$90.00
9771
2515
07/24/01
1449
$15,270.00
$13,350.00
$13,230.00
$19,500.00
$4,503.00
$715.00
$5,593.50
$2,640.00
$2,400.00
$1,800.00
$8,370.00
$7,650.00
$1,050.00
$2,029.50
$5,550.00
$9,000.00
$4,650.00
$24,000.00
$99.00
9771
2515
07/24/01
1449
9771
2515
07/24/01
1449
9771
2515
07/24/01
1449
9771
2515
07/24/01
1451
9771
2515
07/24/01
1451
9771
2515
07/24/01
1451
9771
2515
07/24/01
1447
9771
2515
07/24/01
1450
9771
2515
07/24/01
1449
9771
2515
07/24/01
1450
9771
2515
07/24/01
1447
9771
2515
07/24/01
1447
9771
2515
07/24/01
1450
9771
2515
07/24/01
1447
9771
2515
07/24/01
1448
9771
2515
07/24/01
1451
9771
2515
07/24/01
1448
9771
2515
07/24/01
1448
9771
2515
07/24/01
1447
CHEVRONTEXACO
CITY OF SAN JOSE
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
PRINCETON DEVELOPMENT
Total Rebates FY04
$3,153.00
$3,153.00
$3,153.00
$3,153.00
$3,153.00
$3,153.00
$92,702.40
4723550
FY 01 - FY03(Previously Reported)
PG&E Ck#8632765
PG&E 976 Lenzen Ck#8366782
PG&E 976 Lenzen Ck#188017
PG&E 850 Thornton Ck#8366783
PG&E 701 Abel Ck#8366802
PG&E 614 Tully Ck#8366793
PG&E 590 East Middlefield Ck#8366784
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8366794
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8366797
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8366801
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8366779
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8354985
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8355095
PG&E 4525 Union #10A Ck#8366787
PG&E 4525 Union #10A Ck#8366781
PG&E 298 Garden Hill Ck#8366780
PG&E 2700 Carol Ck#8366789
PG&E 2645 Zanker Ck#8366796
PG&E 2610 N. 1st St #201 Ck#8366796
PG&E 1989 McKee Ck#8366791
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8366785
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8366799
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8366778
PG&E 1735 N. 1st St. Ck#8366798
PG&E 1725 Technology Ck#8366790
PG&E 1555 Berger Drive Ck#8366795
PG&E 1555 Berger Drive
PG&E 1555 Berger Drive
PG&E 1555 Berger Drive
PG&E 1555 Berger Drive
Ck#8366803
Ck#8366800
Ck#8366792
Ck#8366786
PG&E 217 Devcon Ck#8384912
PG&E 95 W. Younger Ck#8410236
PG&E 701 Abel Ck#8407279
PG&E 660 S. Fairoaks Ck#8410242
PG&E 660 S. Fairoaks Ck#8410240
PG&E 590 East Middlefield Ck#8407282
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8410229
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8410228
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8407283
PG&E 298 Bernal Rd Ck#8407280
PG&E 1989 McKee Ck#8410241
PG&E 19050 Malaguerra Ave Ck#8407281
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8410230
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8410239
PG&E 298 Garden Hill Ck#8431380
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8431381
PG&E Ck#8407278
PG&E 850 Thornton Ck#8437841
PG&E 80 Highland Ave Ck#8438934
PG&E 55 West Younger Ck#8438933
PG&E 298 Bernal Rd Ck#8438938
PG&E 2700 Carol Ck#8438940
PG&E 1989 McKee Ck#8438936
PG&E 19050 Malaguerra Ave Ck#8438937
PG&E 190 Leavesley Rd #1 Ck#8438941
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8438942
PG&E 180 West Hedding Ck#8438939
PG&E 1650 Los Plumas #A Ck#8438943
PG&E 1110 L Avenida Ave Ck#8438935
City of Palo Alto - lnv.Ref.#108 Ck#640762
PG&E - 245 Park Avenue Ck#8460040
PG&E Ck#8460038
PG&E Ck#8460039
PG&E Ck#8460037
PG&E Ck#8460036
PG&E - 614 Tully Rd Ck#8470130
PG&E - 450 Montague Expwy. Ck# 8470131
PG&E - Metcalf Rd. Ck#8484948
PG&E - 614 Tully Rd Ck#8484947
City of Santa Clara Rebate Ck274821 10/01
PG&E Ck#8524475
PG&E Ck#8534351
PG&E Ck#8534352
PG&E Ck#8534353
Energy Rebate GSA Ck#647345
Energy Rebate GSA Ck#647548
$13,950.00
$3,420.00
$2,280.00
$1,500.00
$6,000.00
$510.00
$252.00
$1,353.00
$874.50
9771
2515
07/24/01
1448
9771
2515
07/24/01
1448
9771
2515
07/24/01
1448
9771
2515
07/24/01
1451
9771
2515
08/10/01
2714
4105
9771
2515
08/29/01
9771
2515
08/29/01
4104
9771
2515
08/29/01
4105
9771
2515
08/29/01
4105
$72.00
$478.50
9771
2515
08/29/01
4104
9771
2515
08/29/01
4103
$3,915.00
9771
2515
08/29/01
4104
9771
2515
08/29/01
4104
9771
2515
08/29/01
4104
9771
2515
08/29/01
4105
9771
2515
08/29/01
4104
4105
4105
$97.88
$48.00
$742.50
$24.00
$1,183.87
9771
2515
08/29/01
$457.88
$24.00
$144.00
$156.00
$96.00
9771
2515
08/29/01
9771
2515
09/05/01
4472
9771
2515
09/05/01
4473
9771
2515
09/05/01
4472
9771
2515
09/06/01
4560
$1,890.00
$1,138.50
$1,386.00
9771
2515
09/06/01
4559
9771
2515
09/06/01
4560
9771
2515
09/06/01
4559
4559
$82.50
9771
2515
09/06/01
$2,277.00
9771
2515
09/06/01
4560
$825.00
$600.00
9771
2515
09/06/01
4559
9771
2515
09/06/01
4560
$5,062.50
$1,237.50
$210.00
$2,280.00
9771
2515
09/06/01
4559
9771
2515
09/06/01
4560
9771
2515
09/06/01
4559
9771
2515
09/06/01
4560
$140.00
9771
2515
09/17/01
5266
$2,550.00
$4,890.00
$11,340.00
$2,970.00
$2,880.00
$3,069.00
$3,600.00
9771
2515
09/20/01
5527
9771
2515
09/20/01
5527
9771
2515
09/20/01
5527
5527
$72.00
$1,023.00
$2,130.00
$1,410.00
$2,100.00
9771
2515
09/20/01
9771
2515
09/20/01
5527
9771
2515
10/01/01
6272
9771
2515
10/01/01
6272
9771
2515
10/12/01
7137
9771
2515
10/12/01
7137
9771
2515
10/12/01
7137
9771
2515
11/07/01
8950
9771
2515
11/14/01
9346
$1,530.00
$360.00
9771
2515
11/14/01
9346
9771
2515
11/14/01
9346
$200.00
9771
2515
12/18/01
1743
$1,390.00
9771
2515
12/21/01
2053
Energy Rebate GSA Ck#278779
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612859
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612858
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612857
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612856
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612855
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612854
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612853
PG&E Energy Rebate-GSA Ck#8612852
PG&E Ck#8632766
PG&E Ck#8632767
PG&E Ck#8632768
PG&E Ck#8632769
PG&E Ck#8632770
PG&E Ck#8632771
PG&E 150 LEAVESLEY RD CK#9252752
PG&E 1215 1ST ST CK#9252754
PG&E 190 LEAVSLEY RD CK#9252753
PG&E LANDING METCALF PROJ CK#9245663
Total Rebates FY01 to FY03
$135.00
9771
2515
12/28/01
2462
$1,230.00
9771
2515
01/15/02
3566
$360.00
9771
2515
01/15/02
3566
$1,530.00
$1,683.00
$742.50
$1,435.50
$900.00
$570.00
$165.00
$709.50
$346.50
$313.50
9771
2515
01/15/02
3566
9771
2515
01/15/02
3567
9771
2515
01/15/02
3567
9771
2515
01/15/02
3567
9771
2515
01/15/02
3567
9771
2515
01/15/02
3567
9771
2515
02/04/02
4913
9771
2515
02/04/02
4913
9771
2515
02/04/02
4913
9771
2515
02/04/02
4913
$189.75
$561.00
$360.00
9771
2515
02/04/02
4914
9771
2515
02/04/02
4914
9771
2515
04/17/03
020131
$1,217.00
$1,837.50
$923.50
9771
2515
04/17/03
020131
9771
2515
04/17/03
020131
9771
2515
04/17/03
020131
$262,948.13
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
09/21/2004
1
Expense Report: ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
LABOR
WoNum
Status
Description
Bldg Nm
Regular
MATERIAL
$74,760
SERVICE
TOTAL
VENDOR
COST
$17,292
$575,954
S17;4S2.
: : $151,775
$450,000
$4,337
$479,564
$483,901
ALCOHOL :
$60,000
;:$173
:$I?7,886
$128,060
$6,263:
SSA CHILD
$40,000
$925
$14,650
$15,576
$25,000
REPLACE WRIGHT RANCH PUMP SANTA TERESA
$40,000 ;
$128
:$85;
$214
CLOSE
Energy Curtailment Projects - Various COUNTY SERVICE
$85,000
$38,812
$34,148
$72,961
CLOSE
Add Diverter Valve to boilers - East
$772
$686
$1,458
$5,500
$6,958
$1,373
$3,561
$19,591
$23,152
:S942
$2,487
$1,209
$3,696
$4,967
$7,075
$1,630
$8,705
$686
$686
$85
$2,660
460224
CLOSE
ROOFING PROJ ECTS - Elmwood
ELMWD REHAB
460226
CLOSE
RE-ROOF- MARIPOSA LODGE
460231
CLOSE
REPLACE ROOF-SSA
465831
CANCL
485091
496975
496978
Overtime
Est Cost
TOTAL LABOR
CLOSE
CCOB-EAST WING
: :
Install New Boiler Controls - Building COUNTY SERVICE
, $7,000; ;
$20,000
$2,188
$214
$15,953
$88,914
496981
CLOSE
Set or Install time
ALCOHOL::; ;; ;;
i; $2,500 j
496982
CLOSE
Set or Install time
ELMWD REHAB
$5,000
496983
CLOSE
Setor InHalLume : i v:
ELMWD REHAB
496984
CLOSE
Set or Install lime
PROBATION-MURIE
,496985
CLOSE
Set 9r Install time
JAMES
496986
CLOSE
Set or Install time
HOLDEN
496987:
CLOSE
Set or Install time
JUVENILE;; :
$5,000
$514
$L845:
$2,360
496988
CLOSE
Set or Install time
PROBATION-WORK
$1,500
$1,351
$214
$1,566
$1,566
496989
CLOSE :; ;Adjust Ecbnpmizersfor Maximum
SANTA
Si,000
$L<»58
$1,058
$1,058;
496990
CLOSE
Replace vanity lights with fluorescents SUNNYVALE
$391
$391
496991
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for;Maxiraurn
:Si:p2;
$102
496993
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
496994
: CLOSE
496995
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
496996
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers:for Maximum
496997
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
HOLDEN
496999
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
PROBATION-MURIE
497000
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
NORTH COUNTY
497001
CLOSE : : Adjust Economizers:for MaxiUium
497002
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
GSA
$5,000
497003:: :
CLOSE
Adjust Econpmizersfpr Maximum
parkalameda
$5,000 :
497004
CLOSE
Adjust Econpmizers for Maximum
FAIR OAKS MENTAL
$250
497005
close / Adjust Ecpnomizers for Maximum
ChabpyaVHC
$700
497011
CLOSE
497013
CLOSE . : Adjust Ecpnpmizers for Maximum
:jSQUTH GOUI4TY ;
SOUTH COUNTY
:
: :$L?44,
$40,576
$2,107
$600
$5,000
$300
$2,574
$257,
$100 ;
$5,000
AcyustEconoimzerslor Maximum; :Sipu;iTlCOUNTY ;;T
Adjust Ecpnpmizers for Maximum
SOUTH COUNTY
; JM^ES
$643
$600
VASONA
,53-921
$4,361
:
$1,000
:i$948
$4,995
$7,655
$257
$257
$0
$0
$L640
$630
$4,000
$1,022
$102
:
$0
$0
SO
; ; SO
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$643
$643
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8,283 : .
$61,548:
$69,832
$214
$214
$214
$686
$686
$686
$0
$0
SOUTH COUNTY
PROBATION-WORK
$686
$600
$1,549
:
$34
$1,583:
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
Expense Report: ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
09/21/2004
2
LABOR
Status
WoNum
Description
Bldg Nm
Regular
Overtime
Est Cost
497014
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
ELMWD REHAB
$3,000
497015
:; CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
ELMWD REHAB
$600
497016
CLOSE
Adjust Economizers for Maximum
NORTH COUNTY
$200
497035
CLOSE
Install Motion Sensors in Conference CCOB^EAST WING
$20,000
497036
CLOSE
Install Low Voltage Switches by
CCOB-EAST WING
$17,500
497037
CLOSE
Install Low Voltage Switches by
: CCOB-EAST WING
$5,000
TOTAL LABOR
MATERIAL
SERVICE
TOTAL
VENDOR
COST
$1,201
$3,527
$3,527
$686
$686
; $686
$171
$171
$171
$2,310
$21,537
$23,847
$1,472
$15,286
$16,758
$5,951
$2,325
;
:
$7,514
$31,362
$177
$3,141
$20,076
$8,048
:$1;5
$8,063
$2,392
$91,706
$152,220
497038
CLOSE
Install Motion Sensors in Conference COUNTY SERVICE
$45,000
$7,649
$50,472
$58,122
497039
CLOSE
Install Mouon Sensors in Conference: HALL OF
$45,000
$3,748
: $36,620:
$40,368
: ;:$11,661
>$52,030
497040
CLOSE
Install Motion Sensors in Conference SHERIFF
$15,000
$14,006
$14,006
$6,493
$20,500
: :::: :$673
$1,379
$2,291
$3,670
$6,473
$7,649
$6,325
$13,975
$230
$308
497041
. Replace all Incendescent Type Exit
CCOBrEAST WING
:$L500
$7,000
497042
CLOSE
Replace all Incendescent Type Exit
CCOB-WEST WING
497043
; ::CLOSE
Replace allincendescent Type Exit
HALL OF
497044
CLOSE
Replace all Incendescent Type Exit
JUVENILE
497045
CLOSE
Replace all Incendescent Type Exit
SHERIFF
497046
CLOSE
Replace all Incendescent Type Exit
COUNTY SERVICE
497047
CLOSE
Replace allliicendescent Type Exit
COUNTY SERVICE
497049
CLOSE
Replace all Incendescent Type Exit
COUNTY SERVICE
497050
;CLOSE
497051
CLOSE
497053
: CLOSE
497054
CLOSE
Install Task Lighting Motion Sensor
CLOSE
InstallTasklightingMotion Sensbr : SHERIFF
497056
CLOSE
Install Task Ughting Motion Sensor
497057
-CLOSE
497058
CLOSE
Install Task Lighting Motion Sensor
497732
CLOSE
498238
497055
:
;
$1,175
$78
$500
$4,460
$5i000
Install Task Lighting Motion Sensor: : CGOB-E/VST WING :
Install Task Lighting Motion Sensor
$705: : 1
$18,000:,^
S634
$4,137
$12,000
CCOB-WEST WING
Install Task Lighting Motion S^sot > :HALL OF :
: : $500
JUVENE-E
$5,000
$643
:
$2,000
Install Task Lighting Motion Sensor; COUNTY SERVICE
$4,460
$0
$0
$15,274
$7,774
$1,431:
$1,431
$1,896
$1,896
$3,712:
Replace intetibr light with Energy:
JUVENILE
$2,000: -
CLOSE
Install Energy Saving Components -
MAIN JAIL NORTH -
498518
CLOSE
Contract to Support EnergyProjects ;- COUNTY SERVICE
500625
CLOSE
Install Motion Sensors and Locking
MEDICAL
$3,000
500920
CLOSE
Install Tiiher for Exterlor Lights -;
DOWNTOWN
$1,000
501217
CLOSE
Install Elevator Signs in support of the CCOB-EAST WING
501281
, : / CLOSE
$405
$405
$7,131
$24,073
$500
$1,158
$2,915
$11,580
$3,805
$1,431
$2,092
$196
$3,712.
$24,516
:$E489:
$128
:
$4,460
$3,000
$443
$1,800
$0
$12,274
$5,000
>
$0
$8,136
COUNTY SERVICE
CCOBrEAST WING
$0
$133,103
$2,850
Install Tint on Elevator Windows
$0
$114,245;
$862
$5,000
$0
$18,857
$4,000, : ;:
$10,000
$0
:$18i2p:: :; :
:$405 : :
$i:.500
COUNTY SERVICE
: ::
$78::
$912
$25,429
$4,969
$6i459
$26,307
$26,435
$3,111
$29,547
$304
$304
$1,230
$1,534
$1,673
$2,832
$261
$3,093
$1,029 :
$1,029
$62
$1,092
$1,445
$4,360
$;i>278
$1,278
$4,360
$1,778
$500 :::: ::: ;;
I
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
Expense Report: ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
09/21/2004
3
LABOR
WoNum
501314
504047
Status
CLOSE
CLOSE
Description
Perform Meter Expansion Survey -
Overtime
Est Cost
Bldg Nm
$20,000
Install Motion Sensors and Attic Fans CHILD SHELTER
; : $6,587
$13^879:
$9,046
$15,953
$10,000
SOCIAL SERVICES
$2,675
$128
$10,000
COUNTY SERVICE
Regular
COST
$2,804
$8,350
$11,154
$20,467;
$9,600
$1,342
$31,410
$24,999
$50,792
$45,684
$121,475
CLOSE
Install Task Lighting - SSA -
505096
CLOSE
Review Feasibility Studies for Energy COUNTY SERVICE
505171
CLOSE
install motion sensor lights in the three GSA
507082
: CLOSE
507084
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSOR WALL EAST VALLEY
$3,000
$6,965
$6,965
507085
CLOSE
INSTALLMOTION SENSOR WALL EAST VHC(PH)
$6,500
$6,830; ; ;
$6,830
507087
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSOR WALL **DEMOLISHED**V
507088
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSOR WALL FAIR OAKS IvlENTAL
507768
CLOSE
Cut down on Interior Lighting -
COUNTY SERVICE
507771
CLOSE
Cut down on Interior Lighting -■
ELMWD REHAB
507824
CLOSE
REDUCE LIGHTING IN BUTLER
VMC-HEALTH
507825
OLOSE
CUT BACKLIGHTING IN FOOD
ELMWD REHAB
507827
CLOSE
MINIMIZE LIGHTING IN
COUNTY SERVICE
508406
CLOSE
Provide a sdtvey to deteriniheivyays to STARLIGHT
508518
CLOSE
INVENTORY SETBACK
TRAFFIC COURT
508568
CLOSE
Replace old thennostat with hew
SOCIAL;
$200
508599
CLOSE
REPLACE T - 12 LAMPS WITH T -
ALCOHOL
$800
508926
CLOSE
Support; Andpyer EnergyUpgrades
CCOB^EAST WING
509219
CLOSE
PROVIDE / INSTALL
DOWNTOWN
509247:
: CLOSE
Change aU m&ury thermostats to
VASONA
509513
CLOSE
Install Emergency Generator to
SUNNYVALE
510265
: CLOSE
Inventory T-stats - Parks
TOTAL
VENDOR
MATERIAL
504395
INSTALL MOTION SENSOR WALL ; FAIR:0AKS;VHG:
SERVICE
TOTAL LABOR
$0
$0
$128
$500
^
:ALMADEN
$700
:
$386
$18,000
$386
$514
$660 ; :
$660
$19,011
$574
$59
$2,608:
$3,269
$654
$7,620
$6,830
$377
$19,397
$19,774
$2,758
$2,758
$5,000
$0
$0
$5,000
$0 : :
$3,000
$2/7587
vV
:
$200
$171;: :
$2,128
$2,000
$5,000
;$85
:;
$0
$171
$171
$2,128
$2,128
$Q
$0
$0
$0
$85; : L
$11,359
$19,223
$27,848
$257
$257
S813:
$815
$70,000
$772
$772
$1,000
$772
$772
$8,624
$5,000
: $1,000
510698
CANCL
INSTALL override for BLDG.
CCOB-EAST WING
510699
CANCL
INSTALL OVERRIDE FOR
GOUNTYSERVICE; : ™
510701
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS. SEE Chaboya VHC
$5,000
510704
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS- SEE : PROB ATION-MURIE
$5,000
510707
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS - SEE JAMES
$5,000
510708
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS ^ SEE HOLDEN
$7,500
511000
CANCL
INSTALL OVERRIDES FOR HVAC COUNTY SERVICE
$1,500
511003
CANCL
INSTALL OVERRIDES FOR HVAC COUNTY SER VICE
:
$50,000
: :;
:
;
: . : : ;$196
$514
$8,115
$0
$11,359
$50,000
$8,115:
$100
$185
$393
$11,753
$39,154
$11,306
$257
$243
$1,058
$772
:
$395
$1,167
$0
$0
$0;;
$0
$239
$13,018
$12,778
$12,778
$6,642
$6,642
$4,261
$4,261
$7,809
$8,005
$8,005
$1,201
$1,201
$686
:$o::'
$6,642
$54
$4,316
■
;$o:
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
Expense Report: ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
09/21/2004
4
LABOR
Status
WoNum
Description
Bldg Nm
Overtime
Est Cost
TOTAL LABOR
Regular
MATERIAL
SERVICE
TOTAL
VENDOR
COST
$335
$335
$335
512004
CLOSE
investigate and correct parking lot
Superior Court Admin
$5,000
512005
CANCL
INVESTIGATE AND CORRECT
DOWNTOWN
$5,000: : :
$0
512006
CANCL
INVESTIGATE AND CORRECT
OLD COURT HOUSE
$1,000
$0
512161
CLOSE
INVESTIGATE EMS SYSTEM TO
512163
CLOSE
SET THE SOUTH COUNTY
JAMES
$1,500
$1,373
$1,373
$1,373
512165
CLOSE
SET BARBER COLMAN EMS
MAIN JAIL NORTH-
$1,000
$858
$858
$858
CANCL
WALK THRU WITH MELANIE TO
DOWNTOWN
$5,000
$0
$0
512756
513043
CLOSE
RECONFIGURE A/C CONTROLS;; ;; ELMW3 RfflAB
513152
CLOSE
INSTALL WALL MOTION
513213
CLOSE
REPAIRmEPLACEROOF ATEA^: EAST VHGXPH)
CLOSE
513218
REPAIR/REPLACE ROOF AT
San Martin VHC(din
REPAIR/REPLAGE ROOF AT
PROBATION-MURIE
513220
CLOSE
REPAIR/REPLACE ROOF AT
MEDICAL
513221
CLOSE
REPAIR/REPLACE ROOF AATHOJ HALL OF
513231
CLOSE
ENERGY SAVINGS PROJECTS
Service Center Compl
513445
CLOSE
Install 2 pole time clock;to control
JUVENILE
513874
CLOSE
Install(4)Programmable Thermostats GSA FLEET
513875
; CLOSE
Install TLCUghtingControlS:-:::;
516567
CLOSE
516568
:
$450
$2,660
$5,000
$643
$410
: : $1,054
$12,043
$12,043
$277
$12,321
$2,208
$2/208
::
$67,658 \
;
: $70,743
$114
$49,901
$248
$15,386:
.
$2,950
; $117/118
$62,848
$52,150; :
$386
$2,600
:
$125,844
$0
$0
$5,000
$16,158
$102,966
$54,456
$8,392
$8,392
, . $3,084
V
$101,484
$101,484- : ;
$80,000 :
$13,950 :
$52,951
$52,951
$108,000
; ;$3,326:
$215
$3,110
:
$643
: $5,000:
SOUTH COUNTY
CLOSE
513219
$5,000
ALAMEDA
$0
$985; :
$2,986
$915
$486
$1,000
$429
$429
DOWNl'OWN
;$200
$14,782
$14,782
SOUTH COUNTY
$5,000
$0
$0
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
ADJUST THERM0STATS:F0R
SOUTH COUNTY
$5,000; .
$0
$0
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
TEMPORARY
$5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
516573
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
$5,000
$0
516574
LOS GATOS
: : $0:
adjust THERMOSTATS FOR
SANTA
$5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
516576
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
SUNNYVALE
$5;000 :
:: :$574
CLOSE
; $574
516577
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
TRAFHC COURT
$5,000
$214
CLOSE
$214
516579
516581
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
FAMILYCOURT
$5,000
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
SSA/FAMILY
$5,000
$171
516582
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
Superior Court Admin
$5,000
: $85: -
516584
516587
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
Superior Court - Pro
$5,000
516589
CLOSL
MISCELLANEOUS OTHER(DO
CRIMINAL COURTS
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
DOWNTOWN
$5,000
$85
$85
516590
OLDCOURT HOUSE
$5,000:
$514
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
$514
516591
:
$5,000 :
:$574/ $214
$77 :
$4,598
$285:;: ;
; $77
$77.
$171
$171
$85;^
$85
$0
$0
■ - ■ $422'::"
:'''--'$422 "
: $19,666
$495
$72;.
$85
$573:
;$58::
I
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
09/21/2004
Expense Report; ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
S
LABOR
WoNum
Status
Description
Overtime
Est Cost
Bldg Nm
516593
CLOSE
ADJUST THERMOSTATS FOR
HALL OF
$5,000
517188
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS
GSA
$5,000.
517220
CLOSE
RAISE TEMPERATURE IN AREAS HALL OF
517421
CANCL
ESTIMATE TO BREAK DOWN THE MAIN JAIL SOUTH -
521136
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS TO
SSA
521138
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS TO
SSA - CALWORKS
521142
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS TO
521145
CLOSE
521146
CLOSE
521147
CLOSE
Regular
$317
TOTAL LABOR
MATERIAL
SERVICE
TOTAL
VENDOR
COST
$317
$317
$0
$0
$700
$1,158
$1,158
$1,158
$12,415
: ::$I,038^
$1,038
$1,038
$1,209
$1,209
$1,209
$5,000
V $5,610
$5,610
CIVIC CENTER
$5,000
$711
$711
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS TO
PROEfATION-WORK;
$5,000
:$3,281::;:: v
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS TO
SSA CHILD
$5,000
$1,058
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS TO
MEDICAL y
$5,764
$153
$711
$3,308
$27
- $3,281
$1,058
$1,058
: $5;ooo : :;
$2,609
$2,609
$2,609
$5,000
$2,646
$2,646
$2,646
$12,939
$12,939
$1,185
$1,185
$3,847
$3,847
$257
$257
$257
523543
CLOSE
PUT CONTROLS ON HR DEPT.
CCOB-EAST WING
523545
CLOSE
DIM STAIRWELL UGHTS. ;
NORTH COUNTY
523677
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS FOR NORTH COUNTY
524306
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
JUVENILE
524307
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
HALL OF
$5,000
524309
CLOSE^^ ^
GSAGARAGE
$5,000
$1,158
$1,158
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
ROADS &
$5,000
$0
$0
524310
524311
CLOSE
PUT TTMERSCR MO™N
FAIR OAKS'mental
$5,000
'$360
$360
$360 I
$5,000
$302
$302
$302
524312
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
524313:
CLOSE ;;; PUT TIMERS OR MOTION ;
524314
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
n
MEDICAL
:
$5,000 ::
$5,000
: :CRIMINAL COURTS : ; ; ; ; $5,000
GSA
$5,000
$351
V
$13,129
$190 ;
$1,185
$10,435
$6,588
$2,317
$2,317;
$2,317;
$2,278
$2,630
$2,630
$1,115;:
$1,115
$1,1:15;
:eGOB-WESTAVING:
:$5i000
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
CCOB-EAST WING
$5,000
$858
$858
$858
CLOSE ; PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
COUNTY SERVICE
$5,000
$714;
$714
:/'$714
524319
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
COUNTY SERVICE
$5,000
$257
$257
$257
524320
524321
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
COUNTY SERVICE
$5,000
$909
$909
$909
install timers or sensors on lights
DOWNTOWN
S5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
524322
524323
CLOSE
PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
LOS G.ATOS
$609
$609
$609
CLOSE
PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
OLD COURT HOUSE
$386
$386
$386
524325
CLOSE
PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
: $5,000
$600
$600
$600
524326 :
CANCL
PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
SHERIFF
$5,000
$257
$257
$257
524328
CLOSE
PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
SOUTH COUNTY
$756
$756:
524329
524315
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION ;
524317
CLOSE
; DOWNTOWN
; ;?S,000 .;
;
$756
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
Expense Report; ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
09/21/2004
6
LABOR
WoNum
Status
Description
San Martin VHC(Adul
524331
CLOSE
524332/: Z ;:
CLOSE : ,: PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
SAN MARTIN VHC
524334
CLOSE
SOUTH COUNTY
524339
PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
Bldg Nm
PUT LIGHTS ON TIMER OR
: : vCLOSE : : PUT TIMERS OR MOTION :
i ; HALL OF
Overtime
Est Cost
Regular
TOTAL LABOR
$5,000
; $604
$5,000
$5,000
$85
;
n ;
MATERIAL
SERVICE
TOTAL
VENDOR
COST
$0
$0
$604
$604
$0
$0
^
$85
$85:
$5,000
$1,476
$1,476
$1,476
NORTH COUNTY
: : : :$5,000:
$128
$128
$128
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
NORTH COUNTY
$5,000
$3,733
$3,733
$3,733
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
MAIN JAIL SOUTH -
$5,000
$429
$429
:,$429':
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
MAIN JAIL NORTH-
$5
$128
$128
$128
524352
524586
CLOSE
INSTALL TIMERS OR MOT10N
WST VALLEY
$5,000
$1,925
$1,925
$1,925
CLOSE
REPLACE 9 INCANDESCENT EXIT MEDICAL
$5,000
$507
$507
$507
525103
526043
CLOSED ^ : P^^^^ energy RELATED
524345
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
SANTA
524346:
CLOSE
PUT TIMERS OR MOTION
524349
CLOSE
524351
SUNNYVALE
$i:28
:$5i00o
$2,212:
526044
CLOSE
PROVIDE ENERGY RELATED
STARLIGHT
$5,000
$11,208
$11,208
526046
CTOSE
PROVIDE ENERGY RELATED
TRAFFIC COURT
$5,000
$738
$738
$2,020
$2,341
$2,341
$2,020
$555
$11,763
$1,236
$3,257
$738 I
526047
CLOSE
PROVIDE ENERGY RELATED
ALMADEN
$5,000
526049
CANCL
PROVIDE ENERGY RELATED
SSA CHILD
:$5;000:
$0
PROVIDE ENERGY RELATED
SERVER CREEK
$5,000
$0
CANCL
$0
526050
CANCL
PROVIDE ENERGY RELATED
$5:,P00:
$0
526052:
SANTA
$0
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
DOWNTOWN
$1,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
528501
REiSET THERMOSTATS
Chaboya VHC
sliooo
$120
CLOSE
$120
528502^
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
PARK ALAMEDA
$1,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
528503
CIOSE
re-SET THERMOSTATS
TRAFFIC COURT
:$l:,p00;
$:1:,467
$1,467
$1,467
528508:
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
PROBATION-MURIE
$1,000
$257
$257
CLOSE
$257
528510
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
alcohol
:$i:,ooo
$85
$85
528516
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
ALMADEN
$1,000
$171
$171
528521
CLOSE
RE-SETTHERMOSTATS
NORTH COUNTY
:$1.000
$171:-:
$171
528525
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
PROBATION-WORK
$1,000
$171
$171
CLOSE
$171
528528
$0
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTAl S Closeftas; SUNNYVALE:
: : : $0
528536;
$1,000
$0
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS. Closed as FAIR OAKS MENTAL
$0
528542
$1,000
$171
$171
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS. Closed as SANTA
$171
528543
RE-SETTHERMOSTATS.
LOS GATOS
$1,000
$171
$171
CLOSE
$171
528545
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS.
SOUTH COUNTY
$1,000
$42
$42
: 528546
: :: : $1,000; :
$120
/
$0
: :$85:
$171
$42;;:
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
Expense Report: ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
09/21/2004
7
LABOR
WoNum
Status
Description
Overtime
Est Cost
Bldg Nm
Regular
TOTAL LABOR
MATERIAL
SERVICE
TOTAL
VENDOR
COST
$171
$171
528547
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
SOUTH COUNTY
$1,000
$171
CLOSE
RE-SETTHERMOSTATS
SOUTHCOUNTY
$1,000
. $42 :
$42
$42:
528548
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
SOUTH COUNTY
$1,000
$42
$42
$42
528549
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
SOUTH COUNTY
$1,000
$42
$42
$42
528550
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS. Closed as VASONA
$1,000
$171
$171
$171
528551
CLOSE
RE-SET thermostats.
$1,000
$171;: n
$171
$171
528552
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
JUVENILE
$0
$0
528578
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS.
EUvIWD REHAB
;$497
$497
528579
CLOSE
RE-SET THERMOSTATS
ELMWD REHAB
$514
528581
528582
CLOSE
R&SETTHERMOSTA^,
HOLDEN
532259
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
532261
CLOSE
532263
: JAMES
:
$1,000
:
:$497T :
$1,000
$1,000
$514
$514
: $1,000^
$171
$171
MAIN JAIL SOUTH -
$5,000
$13,335
$13,335
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
METHADONE
$5,000;:
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
**DEMOLISHED**V
$5,000
$0
532265
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
EAST VALLEY
S5,000
$0
532266
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
EAST VHC(MH)
$5,000
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
GSA GARAGE GAS
$5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0:.; ,.
532287
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
GSA FLEET
$5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
532288
532289
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
CIVIC CENTER
$5,000
$1,287
$1,287
532291
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
J^^^^
$5,000
$4,764
$4,764
532292
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
ROADS
$5,000
$1,373
$1,373
532293
532294
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
COUNTY SERVICE
$5,000
532295
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
COUNTY SERVICE
$5,000
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
COUNTY SERVICE
$5,000
$429 ; :
532296
SOUTH COUNTY
$5,000
$446
$446
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
$446
534355
SOUTH COUNTY
$5,000
$703 ! ;
$703!
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR v
$703
534357:
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
LOS GATOS
$5,000
$909
$909
CLOSE
$909
534359
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
SANTA;
$5,000
:: $1,458
$1,458
534360
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
FAIR OAKS VHC
$5,000
$257
$257
CLOSE
$257
534362
CLOSE
LN'STALl.I>RF-WIRING FOR
FAIR OAKS MENTAL
$5,000!
$257
$257
;: $257
534364;
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
SUNNYVALE
$5,000
$411
$411
CLOSE
$411
534365
334368 : : :
CLOSE! . INSTALL PRE-WIRING!F0R!
PARK ALAMEDA
$5,000
$411
$411
$429
$446
$738;
$1,287
:
$13,335
;
$429;
$738
$429;
$0
:: :::$0
;
$446
$446
; n $0
: GSA-FLEET;;!: n '
: $171;!:
;;
$0
..
$1,287
$5,003
$239:
$1,373
:
$1,025:
: $287
$1,287
$1,287
: $429
$2,250
::
$2,679
$1,458;
nn $411:
8
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
Expense Report: ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
09/21/2004
LABOR
WoNum
Status
Description
Bldg Nm
Overtime
Est Cost
COST
$703
$703
$703
$5,000
$1,047
$1,047
$1,047
OLD COURT HOUSE
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
DOWNTOWN
534373
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR:
Elmwood RehabiUtati:
:$5,000
534376
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
PROBATION-WORK
$5,000
534393:
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
HOLDEN
534394
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
JAMES
534372
TOTAL
VENDOR
$5,000:
INSTALL PRE-WIRINGTOR :
: CLOSE
SERVICE
$1,132
$5,000
534371
MATERIAL
$1,132
EASTVHC(PH)
CLOSE
TOTAL LABOR
$1,132
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
534370
Regular
; \$24,543: ; : /; :
$1,029
:$2A51
: :
$3,665
$5,000
'$2-519
$24,543
$27,063
$1,029
$1,029
$2,351,
$3,298
; : : $947
.
$3,665
$3,665
534396
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE^WIRING FOR
ALCOHOL
;$5i000:
$1,905
$1,905
$1,905
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
PROBATION-MURIE
$5,000
$411
$411
$411
534397
[534399
CLOSE
INSTIL pre-wiring FOR
CHILDSHELTER
$5,000
$3,896
$3,896
$3,896
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
GSA
$5,000
$377
$377
$377
534400
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
GSA
$5,000
$377:
$377:
$377
534401:
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
WOMENS
$5,000
$978
$978
CLOSE
$978
534402
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
MAIN JAIL NORTH -
$5,000
$291
$291
$291
534403
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
GSA-GARAGE GAS
$5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
534404
INSTALL PRE WIRING FOR
****VACANT*MENT
$5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
534405
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
SHOP
$5,000
$421
CLOSE
$421
534406
$5;000:
$0
CLOSE
INSTACL PRE-WIRlNG:;FOR i : ::: StWage Shed
$0
534408
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
Warehouse
$5,000
$0
CLOSE
$0
534409
CLOSE: : mSTAEL PRE-WIRl^ FOR
NORTH COUNTY
$5i000
$1,939
$1,939
534410
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
NORTH COUNTY
$5,000
$514
$514
CLOSE
$514
534411
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
VECTOR CONTROL
$5,bOQ:
$171
$171
CLOSE
$171
534413:
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
WEST VALLEY
$5,000
$909
$909
CLOSE
$909
534414
TEMPORARY
:$5;000
$11218:
$1,218
CLOSE
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
$1,218
534415:
INSTALL PRE-WIRING FOR
SOUTH COUNTY
$5,000
$669
$669
CLOSE
$669
534416
ESTIMATE TO UPGRADE
MAIN JAIL SOUTH-
:$5;ooo
$171 7::.
$171
CLOSE
:$l7i
535232:
537770
CANCL
Contract for electrical Power
COUNTY SERVICE
5394497: 7
: CLOSE
Tintiremaining epuris: windows;f6i:: :: HALL OF
$12,000
$421
$193
$5,000
$15,247
$6,894
$7,087
$1,973
;$34::
$11,600
$18,687
$29,765
:$5:3-
$53,
$29,712.
$108,260
$123,507
$1,020
$127,823
$3,296
540214
CLOSE
Purchase Power Meters for various
COUNTY SERVICE
$270,000
CLOSE
DETERMINEFF NEEDED AND
CCQB-EAST WING
$5iooo;
::$85
$85
$85
559622
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
WEST VALLEY
$5,000
$85
$85
CLOSE
$85
559628
CLOSE
DETERMLNE IF NEEDED AND~
IXIS GATOS
$5,000
:$257:
$257:
559629
$257
I
Page
GSA - Facilities Department - Building Operations Division
Expense Report: ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS MATRIX
09/21/2004
9
LABOR
Status
WoNum
Description
Bldg Nm
Overtime
Est Cost
Regular
TOTAL LABOR
MATERIAL
SERVICE
TOTAL
VENDOR
COST
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
CRIMINAL COURTS
$5,000
$532
$532
$532
559630
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
ROADS &
$5,000
$85
$85
$85
559632
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
FAIR OAKS MENTAL
$5,000
$197
$197
$197
559633
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
FAIR OAKS VHC ;
$5,000
$205
$205
$205
559634
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
NORTH COUNTY
$5,000
$514
$514
$514
559635
559636
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
J uvenile Probation:#
$5,000 .
$674
$674
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
MAIN JAIL SOUTH -
$5,000
$0
$0
559637
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
MADi JAIL NORTH -
$5,000
$0
$0
559638
560933
CLOSE
ESTIMATE COST TO UPGRADE
OFHCE FOR DEBS
$5,000
$619
$619
560935
CLOSE
ESTIMATE COST OF UPGRADING MENTAL HEALT H /
$5,000
;$775
$775
560937
CLOSE
ESTIMATE COST OF UPGRADING SSA/CAL WORKS
$5,000
$1,058
$1,058
561664
CLOSE
Lower t-stats and replace damaged
HALL OF
$5,000
:$1;244
$1,244
564910
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
SHERIFF
$5,000
$6,170
$6,170
564911
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
COUNTY SERyiCE ;
$5,000
$3D15
$3,115
:^
n:;:$674: : >
$438
$1,057
$775
$2,170
$3,228
$1,244
$3,000
$9,170
$3,862;
$6,977
$1,071
$1,414
564913
CLOSE
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
SOUTH COUNTY
$5,000
$343
$343
CLOSE
determine IF NEEDED AND
San Martin VHC(Adul
$5,000
;$188:::
$188
$188
564914
DETERMINE IF NEEDED AND
MEDIC4D
$5,000
$171
$171
CLOSE
$171
564915
CLOSE
INSTALL LOCKING THERMOSTAT ADMIN SSA
, $5,000
$4,149
$4,149
$4,149
INSTALL LOCKING THERMOSTAT DEPT OF FAMILY &
$5,000
$5,594
$5,594
CLOSE
$5,594
564920
CLOSE
PROVIDE PG&E REQUESTED
SSA/CALWORKS
$180,000
$;18v9q8
$18,908
$18*908
573859
PROVIDE PG&E REQUESTED
OFFICE FOR DEBS
$7,000
$3,608
$3,608
CLOSE
$3,608
573862
MAIN JAIL SOUTH
$6,000
;: ::$3*484;
$3,484
CLOSE ; Improve Lighting in Boiler Room -
$3,484
575492
CLOSE
Adjust Lighting in the Garage - Park
CIVIC CENTER
$5,000
$7,989
$7,989
575569
582163
CLOSE
SUPPORT RE-LAMPING
CCOB-EAST WING
582165
CLOSE
INSTALL MOTION SENSORS
PUBLIC DEFENDER
583713:
CLOSE
Siipport Electrical Power Monitoring COUNTY SERVICE
:: ::::::$15,000
586867
CLOSE
Relamp warehouse - Building One -
COUNTY SERVICE
$2,700
GROUPS 1 & 2 - ENERGY
COUNTY SERVICE ;
564919
:
600443
-CLOSE:
600444
CLOSE
PRISON TOILET SYSTEM -
COUNTY SERVICE
622980
CLOSE
SUB 600444 - M4 TOILETS-
COUNTYSERVICE
622982
CLOSE
SUB 01600444 - TOILETS M5 -
COUNTY SERVICE
$0
$472
; $463,658
$324,508
:$2,438:::
$666
$5,666
$30,011
$8 387 :
$2,438
$666
$30,011
i;
$86
$472
$3,034
$13,656
$441
$558
$10,825
$4,142
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTALS:
Selection Criteria:
Group By:
Start Date:
WorkType=F,PCA=ROENE
WoNum
Ol/OICOOO
End Date:
09/01/2004
$145,771
$1,667,742
$1,813,513
$351,974
$621,463
$2,786,951
POLICY RESOLUTION # 06-03
Of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Clara
Approving Modifications to the Board Policy Manual Relating to
Green Building Policy
WHEREAS, the County of Santa Clara supports sustainable economic
development by encouraging the expansion of jobs in the environmental services
and materials sector, which includes green building practices, products and
technologies; and
WHEREAS,the County of Santa Clara recognizes and accepts its responsibility
to implement and promote building practices that protect the Santa Clara natural
environment: and
WHEREAS, development and construction practices are significant contributors
to the depletion of natural resources and a contributing cause of water and air
pollution, solid waste, deforestation, toxic wastes, health hazards, global
warming, and other negative consequences; and
WHEREAS, buildings use one quarter of the entire world’s wood harvest,
consume two fifths of all materials and energy flows, and contribute to C02
emissions; and
WHEREAS,the United States Green Building Council has created Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)standards that identify a range of
actions defining green buildings and establishing certification processes for new
and existing buildings; and
WHEREAS,the County of Santa Clara recognizes that green building
complements many existing policies and initiatives related to energy
conservation and alternative energy production, waste reduction, waste
recycling, use of degradable plastic products, e-waste management, pest
management, and low emission vehicles use in the County Fleet;
WHEREAS, the proposed Green Building Policy contains strategies to 1)
evaluate LEED certification in all new construction of County owned buildings
where appropriate, 2) use green building goals and practices in renovations and
operations of existing facilities, 3) provide training and education for all
appropriate County procurement, capital projects and facility management staff
on green building practices and products, and 3) promote voluntary application of
green building guidelines in private sector building design, construction and
operations; and
WHEREAS,the County of Santa Clara has already pursued LEED certification
and applied green building principles in recent bond financed capital projects
including the Crime Laboratory, and Santa Clara Valley Health Clinics at Gilroy,
Milpitas, and Fair Oaks; and
WHEREAS,the County of Santa Clara finds that green design and construction
deoisions made during the construction and remodeling of County owned
buildings can result in significant cost savings to the County over the life of the
buildings; and
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Santa Clara that a Green Building policy be established and that the
Board of Supervisor’s Policy Manual is hereby amended adding Section 7.14 as
follows to establish this poiicy;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the Board is directed to
incorporate this additional language into the Manual so that it is available to all
County staff.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa
by the following vote:
Clara, State of California, on
AYES:
Supervisors
NOES:
Supervisors
ABSTAIN:
Supervisors
ABSENT:
Supervisors
James T. Beall Jr., Chair
Board of Supervisors
DATED:
ATTEST:
Phyllis Perez, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
DATED:
County Counsel
7.14. GREEN BUILDING POLICY
7.14.1 Introduction
“Green building” is the practice of constructing and maintaining buildings in a
manner that provides for efficient and sustainable usage of building materials;
provides for water and energy conservation; provides for a healthy work
environment; and reduces waste and pollution from building construction,
maintenance, and demolition.
The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program, as
developed by the United States Green Building Council, is the most extensive,
authoritative and well recognized standard that distinguishes “green buildings”
from other buildings. The LEED program makes this distinction by providing
common standards of measurement for designing, constructing, and maintaining
“green buildings.” Common measurement standards include usage of
sustainable, recyclable, and non-toxic building materials; standards for reduced
energy and water consumption; and construction practices that reduce
environmental impacts.
7.14.2 Policy Statement
It is the policy of the Board of Supervisors that “green building” standards, as
defined by the LEEDS program and other applicable government building codes,
be implemented for purposes of constructing and maintaining County owned
buildings in a manner that provides for efficient and sustainable usage of building
materials; provides for water and energy conservation; provides for healthy work
environments; and reduces waste and pollution from building construction,
maintenance, and demolition.
The County of Santa Clara recognizes that establishing this policy provides a
model for other jurisdictions, the private sector and County residents. As such it
is intended to establish practices, training programs and procedures that may be
of interest to individuals and organizations. Educational materials will be
available to the public through publicly accessible documentation on the County
website, and through the Planning Department.
7.14.3 Procedures
The following procedures will be used in designing, constructing, maintaining and
demolishing buildings in accordance with “green building” concepts;
(A) The LEED program and its guidelines will be the County’s primary “green
building” standard for designing, constructing, maintaining, and
demolishing buildings.
(B) The LEED program has four levels of “green building” performance
(Certified, Silver, Gold, and Platinum). During the design of each new
building. Capital Programs Division will provide a recommendation to the
Board of Supervisors regarding the appropriate level of LEED certification
and the resulting benefits and costs.
a.
b.
Certain new building types may not be appropriate for LEED
certification. In these situations Capital Programs will provide a
report explaining why LEED certification is not appropriate.
The County may also construct a building to LEED standards, but
forgo the administrative costs of pursuing formal LEED certification
recognition from the United States Green Building Council. Capital
Programs will provide information regarding the administrative
costs of pursuing formal LEED certification in its recommendation
to the Board of Supervisors.
(C) Based upon this information and recommendation, the Board of
Supervisors will provide direction regarding the level of LEED
performance to be achieved for each new County owned building, and
whether the LEED certification process will be pursued to obtain formal
LEED recognition from the United States Green Building Council.
(D) Where no LEED program certification standard exists, the intent of this
policy is that green building practices will be applied to the extent
practicable.
(E) In addition to LEED goals, an additional design goal will be established
for new facilities to exceed California Title 24 Building Code energy
consumption regulations.
(F) New County owned buildings will also be designed to control storm water
runoff in accordance with the requirements and procedures set forth in
the Santa Clara Valiev Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program.
(G) LEED “green building” concepts will be used in building renovations.
These concepts will include to the extent practicable, but not be limited
to, improving water and energy conservation; using non-toxic materials;
using sustainable and recyclable materials; and recycling demolition
materials.
(H) Equipment and products used within buildings will meet established
Board policies pertaining to waste reduction, waste recycling, degradable
plastic products, e-waste management, energy efficient equipment, pest
management, and other related policies.
(I) “Green building” expertise will be a criterion in selecting architectural and
engineering firms.
(J) An evaluation of renewable and/or other alternative energy sources will
be made during the design of new buildings.
(K) An energy analysis will be performed for the design of each new building,
and each energy analysis will receive a design peer review.
(L) To the extent that it is economical and practical, the construction design
for each new building will include installation of individual power meters
that are compatible with and can be incorporated into the Building
Operations Enterprise Energy Management System for energy data
collection, analysis and building energy management.
7.14.4 Education
The County will promote “green building” practices by:
(A)Providing educational brochures and information accessible via the
County website and at the Planning Department Development services
counter.
(B) Participating in and sponsoring educational events.
(C)Training capital project managers and selected facility management staff
on “green building” practices.
(D) Partnering with organizational groups that are promoting “green building’
practices.
Document
Informational report regarding the achievements of the County Energy Conservation Program
Initiative
Collection
James T. Beall, Jr.
Content Type
Report
Resource Type
Document
Date
10/05/2004
District
District 4
Creator
Larry Jinkins
Language
English
Rights
No Copyright: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/