Attachment 4

f

(

County of Santa Clara

It
;rfx

★

^ Office of the District Attorney
County

Government Center, West Wing

SFS^

70 West HcCkiing Stree4

San Jose,caliiomla ttS uo
(AOaj20^7400
wwv%'.saniacianHla.org

Geotgc w.KermeUy
Di&tnci Attornev*

memoranddm
Altec Foster

To:

Deputy County Executive

Kaiyn Sinunif^^

From:

Assistant District Attorney
Date:

Aprini,2001

Re:

Proposition 36

Befim the ptssasc

othets vtete suhi«ct
be

diverted to ueatment
I.

Defersdigibte for DcfeocdEotiy-nu^
are

revetted ftoni custody to treatment.

,pbencycUdine,MDMA

'^Lstasy),LSD,sMTOids.and other DflTCOtKS.
4) ^^Bscnceinaplaccduriiigui^wfiildwgusc.
onder the influence of narcotics;
5)

6)

cultivation of marijuana for personal use;
ith intent to

»)
iriRCSt.
B

?)'*def^^'hi no previous drug
above;

4)

,

probation and/or parole has never been

revoked without later being

04/XX/U1

X-XZOH

tTAA. 400

^OO

rtlAl.

rtUfllXt^

(

‘«jO«wo, ooo

(

5) defendant has had no prior diversion in*^1^/
^ wo nse.
6) dcfendanthashadnofclonycoimctjonwithmSycarsoftlKn
Defendants convicted under by Prop 36 shaU be placed on prolaniqion
and shaU not
Lcarceiatcd. Before Prop 36,they were subject to incarceration

U-

conviction.

A. Prop 36 (^nonviolent drug possession offenses”)
1) possession for personal use
2) use

3) “transportation for personal use
B. Defendant is eligible if;

j •

n the new cbaiges include only the above-listed cnines;

2) ^ndatil^I~ strikes(Penal Code Section667(bHi)) witbm the past
3) dSnthasastrike,hasbeenoutofprisoi.for^last5yea^andh^
afelony other
not

been convicted ofa misdemeanor involvi^ violence or

that a nonviolent drug possession offense during that 5-y^

4) defcndantdidiMDt“usc-afirearmwhilcposscssirigorbeiiigunderthe
or
influence ofcocaine,cocaine base, heroin, metbamphetamme

phencyclidine;
5) defendant does not refuse treatment;
6)

under
defendant has not already had two separate courses oftreatment
defendant
penal Code Section 1210 such that the court now finds
iiTtamftnaMe to all foims oftreatment.

m.

Some basic distinctmns between the two statutes:

A. In general,DEJcovffls first-lime offenders. A defendant
is still eligibly
hc/ritie has been diverted moie than five years ago or a felony ovctfive
he/shc is not
years okf"Ifthe defendant has any previous drug conviction
as
well
as defendants
eligiblc.^n general.Prop 36 covers first^fime offenders possession
and usctjvbo live been convicted any number oftimes for drug
oflfenses and
have gone throng any number oftreatment piogt^ m the
treatment under Prop

past Thera is tio restriction onthe timing ofprevious
36.

B. Ifthe new offense includes DEJ oflfcns^ and other offenses, the defendant
* can be diverted on the narcotics offens^ as long as the other offenses do not
include violence. Ifthe new offense covets Prop 36 offenses and other
offenses,the defendant is not entitled to treatment under P-C. 1210.

C. Under both programs,ifthe defendant has a strike conviction over five years
old, he/she is eligible for treatment. However,ifthe defendant fails DEJ
hc/sbe feces a prison term under the 3-strikcs law while the Prop 36 defendant
most likely feces more treatmcnl. Ifa defendant fails DEJ,hc/she can be
sentenced to county jail or prison. Ifa defendant fails under P-C. 1210.the
general sanction will be finther treatment, with no incarceration absent

specific findings that the defendant is a danger ot society or unamenable to all
IrcatTTienl.

cy; George Kennedy
Stacie Lawson

ATTACHMENT 3

Budget Development Matrix

Proposition 36 Costs - Fiscal Year 2001-2002

Approved By Board

Service Category

C

B

A

Steering Committee

%ofFY2002

Recommendation

Allocation*

Additional Needs

ASSESSMENT
DADS - 3 Positions

$

191,000

$

191,000

3%

Probation - 6 Positions

$

331,000

$

331,000

5%

Subtotal $

522,000

$

522,000

8%

201,133 $
387,898
847,630 $

886,477

13%

542,314

8%

1,607,870
150,000
500,000
150,000
593,000
70,000
4,499,661

24%

67%

496,115

7%

53,470
60,000

1%

609,585
30,000
30,000

9%

TREATMENT

Residential

$

Transitional Housing

$

Outpatient Treatment
Dual Diagnosis

$
$

685,344 $
154,416 $

760,240 $
50,000 $

Case Management

$

Ancillary Services
DADS Admin - 6 positions
Services and Supplies

$

$

Subtotal $

261,000 $
$
1,911,000 $

100,000 $
500,000 $
150,000 $

332,000 $
70,000 $
2,588,661 $

2%
7%
2%
9%
1%

SUPERVISION

Supervision - 7 positions

$

Admin -1 position

$

Services and Supplies

$

TRAINING

(

Subtotal $

$

$

$

Subtotal $

$

\

496,115 $
53,470 $
60,000 $
609,585 $
30,000 $
30,000 $

1%

0%
0%

i

(

(

(

EVALUATION
Automation

$

200,000 $
200,000 $

$

$

$

80,000 $
480,000 $

$

Software/Programming
Data Entry
Data Warehouse

200,000
200,000

0%

80,000

1%

480,000

7%

7%

2,433,000 $

600,000 $
4,308,246 $

450,000
150,000
600,000
6,741,246

Data Analysis/Evaluation

$

Subtotal $

FACILITIES

$

Assessment/Supv. Lease
Remodel Costs (1 time)

$

$

Subtotal

PROP 36 TOTAL $

450,000 $
150,000 $

DRUG TESTING (No Prop 36 Funds)
$

$

181,842 $

181,842

Collection

$

$

Facility Remodeling

$

$

426,852 $
100,000 $

426,852

Analysis

OTHER FUNDS TOTAL $

$

GRAND TOTAL

’^FUNDS AVAILABLE

Fiscal Year 2001 Funds
FY 01 Funds Committed

Subtotal: FY 01 Funds Remaining
Fiscal Year 2002 Funds

Total Funds Available in FY 2002

3%

$2,491,506

($556,849)
$1,934,657
$4,806,589

$6,741,246

708,694 $
$

100,000
708,694
7,449,940

2%

9%
100%

FUNDING PERCENTAGES BY CATEGORY
% FY 02Funds

Service Category
Assessment

Approved

Recommended

$6,741,246
8%

$522,000
$1,911,000

$2,588,661

67%

Supervision

$609,585

9%

Evaluation

$480,000

7%

Facilities

$600,000

9%

$4,308,582

100%

Treatment

Total

1

$2,433,000

1